CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,725Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

The Classical Theory of Fields

L.D. LANDAU, E.M. Lifsic·1975·Elsevier eBooks
DOI 10.1016/c2009-0-14608-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/c2009-0-14608-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The classical Hamiltonian of a particle of mass m and charge q in crossed electromagnetic fields is given by equation (2).

    “The classical Hamiltonian of a particle of mass m and charge q in the presence of these crossed electromagnetic fields is given by [34]:”

    From Quantisation of the elliptical Penning trap (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LANDAU, L. D., & Lifsic, E. M.
Venue
Elsevier eBooks
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1975
DOI
10.1016/c2009-0-14608-1
OpenAlex
W119088996
Cited by
4,725
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 170 · 2021: 202 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 136 · 2017: 149 · 2016: 148 · 2015: 141 · 2014: 156 · 2013: 188 · 2012: 136
FWCI
20.64
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
classical field theory, electromagnetic fields, electrostatics, magnetostatics, Maxwell's equations, Lorentz force

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review