Cited by 1Marine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology StudiesReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Spatial variation in bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus size at sexual maturity in the eastern Pacific Ocean

Open access
Huang, Hongji, Zhou, Cheng, Xu, Liuxiong, Zhu, Jiangfeng, Wang, Xuefang, Cao, Jie·2023·Aquaculture and Fisheries

Abstract

Understanding the reproductive characteristics of a species is of crucial for accurate stock assessment and management plans to ensure sustainable fisheries. In this study, the size at 50% sexual maturity (L50) parameters in different bio-ecological provinces were estimated for bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus, sampled from the Eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fisheries-dependent survey from 2013 to 2019. The overall sex ratio of the catch during the sampling differed significantly from 1:1. Bigeye tuna exhibit sexual dimorphism in the growth of males and females, with a clear shift in predominance from female to male with increasing sizes. In the North Pacific Sub-tropical Gyre (east) (NPST-east), North Pacific Tropical Gyre (NPTG), Pacific North Equatorial Countercurrent (PNEC), and Pacific Equatorial Divergence (PEQD), females (meals) reached sexual maturity round 102 cm (106 cm), 106 cm (100 cm), 125 cm (110 cm), and 113 cm (110 cm), respectively, the estimated L50 of bigeye tuna was 124.08 cm, 121.97 cm, 139.92 cm and 132.45 cm, respectively. The degree of populations mixing between equatorial (PNEC and PEQD) and high-latitude regions (NPST-east and NPTG) is extremely small, but it is reasonably high between the NPST-east and NPTG or PNEC and PEQD. These parameters were significantly different, suggesting the occurrence of a spatial difference in the size-at-maturity of bigeye tuna between these bio-ecological provinces. The findings of this study provide the key information for understanding the life history of bigeye tuna in the Eastern Pacific Ocean and will contribute to the conservation and sustainable yield of this species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aaf.2021.11.003

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Chen, 2020, Growth heterogeneity of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean explored by the mixed effects model, Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 27, 570
  2. Hampton, 2005, A description of tag-recapture data for Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the western and central Pacific Ocean, Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, 57, 85
  3. Hisada, 1973, Investigation of the hand-line fishing grounds and some biological observations on yellowfin and bigeye tunas caught in the north-western Coral Sea, Bulletin Far Seas Fisheries Research Laboratory, 8, 35
  4. Itano, 2000, The reproductive biology of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Hawaiian water and the western tropical Pacific Ocean, Joint Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, 69
  5. Kikawa, 1966, The distribution of maturing bigeye and yellowfin and an evaluation of their spawning potential in different areas in the tuna longline grounds in the Pacific, Report of Nankai Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, 23, 131
  6. Kume, 1969, Ecological studies on Bigeye Tuna-V. Acritical review on distribution, size composition and stock structure of Bigeye Tuna in the North Pacific Ocean (north of 16°N), Bulletin Far Seas Fisheries Research Laboratory, 1, 57
  7. Kume, 1966, Size composition, growth and sexual maturity of bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus, from the Japanese long-line fishery in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Bulletin, 11, 45
  8. Mcpherson, 1992, Assessing macroscopic and histological staging of yellowfin and bigeye tuna ovaries in the north-western Coral Sea, Australian Fishing Zone, 40, 18
  9. Ratty, 1990, Gonad morphology, histology, and spermatogenesis in South-Pacific albacore tuna Thunnus alalunga (Scombridae), Fishery Bulletin, 88, 207
  10. Schaefer, 1987, Reproductive biology of black skipjack, Euthynnus lineatus, an eastern Pacific tuna. Inter-American tropical tuna commission, Bulletin, 19, 169
  11. Shomura, 1962, Growth and sexual dimorphism in growth of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus), a preliminary report, FAO Fisheries Report, 6, 1409

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Huang, H., Zhou, C., Xu, L., Zhu, J., Wang, X., & Cao, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Cheng
Venue
Aquaculture and Fisheries
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
572-578
ISSN
  • 2096-1758 (ISSN-L)
  • 2468-550X
OpenAlex
W4200315927
Cited by
1
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2025-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Aquaculture and Fisheries (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD0901502, 2020YFD0901202)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41506151, 41806110)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
bigeye tuna, size at maturity, L50, spatial variability, sexual dimorphism, sex ratio, population mixing, life history, eastern Pacific, tuna fisheries, stock assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review