Cited by 85Sleep and Work-Related FatigueTraffic and Road SafetyHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Predicting performance and safety based on driver fatigue

Mollicone, Daniel, Kan, Kevin, Mott, Chris, Bartels, Rachel, Bruneau, Steve, van Wollen, Matthew, Sparrow, Amy R., Van Dongen, Hans P.A.·2019·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

Fatigue causes decrements in vigilant attention and reaction time and is a major safety hazard in the trucking industry. There is a need to quantify the relationship between driver fatigue and safety in terms of operationally relevant measures. Hard-braking events are a suitable measure for this purpose as they are relatively easily observed and are correlated with collisions and near-crashes. We developed an analytic approach that predicts driver fatigue based on a biomathematical model and then estimates hard-braking events as a function of predicted fatigue, controlling for time of day to account for systematic variations in exposure (traffic density). The analysis used de-identified data from a previously published, naturalistic field study of 106 U.S. commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers. Data analyzed included drivers' official duty logs, sleep patterns measured around the clock using wrist actigraphy, and continuous recording of vehicle data to capture hard-braking events. The curve relating predicted fatigue to hard-braking events showed that the frequency of hard-braking events increased as predicted fatigue levels worsened. For each increment on the fatigue scale, the frequency of hard-braking events increased by 7.8%. The results provide proof of concept for a novel approach that predicts fatigue based on drivers' sleep patterns and estimates driving performance in terms of an operational metric related to safety. The approach can be translated to practice by CMV operators to achieve a fatigue risk profile specific to their own settings, in order to support data-driven decisions about fatigue countermeasures that cost-effectively deliver quantifiable operational benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.004

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mollicone, D., Kan, K., Mott, C., Bartels, R., Bruneau, S., van Wollen, M., Sparrow, A. R., & Van Dongen, H. P. A.
Affiliations
  • Pulsar Informatics (United States) (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Mollicone, Daniel
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
126
Pages
142-145
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796017944
Cited by
85
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (DTMC7514D00011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
driver fatigue, commercial drivers, fatigue risk management, sleep patterns, actigraphy, road safety, near-crashes, collision risk, fatigue countermeasures
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Attention, Automobile Driving, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Sleep, Wakefulness, Risk Assessment, Motor Vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review