Cited by 12Traffic and Road SafetyRoad Transport and Highway SystemsAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evidence based method to calculate pedestrian crossing speeds in vehicle collisions (PCSC)

Open access
Bastien, C., Wellings, R., Burnett, B.·2018·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

Pedestrian accident reconstruction is necessary to establish cause of death, i.e. establishing vehicle collision speed as well as circumstances leading to the pedestrian being impacted and determining culpability of those involved for subsequent court enquiry. Understanding the complexity of the pedestrian attitude during an accident investigation is necessary to ascertain the causes leading to the tragedy. A generic new method, named Pedestrian Crossing Speed Calculator (PCSC), based on vector algebra, is proposed to compute the pedestrian crossing speed at the moment of impact. PCSC uses vehicle damage and pedestrian anthropometric dimensions to establish a combination of head projection angles against the windscreen; this angle is then compared against the combined velocities angle created from the vehicle and the pedestrian crossing speed at the time of impact. This method has been verified using one accident fatality case in which the exact vehicle and pedestrian crossing speeds were known from Police forensic video analysis. PCSC was then applied on two other accident scenarios and correctly corroborated with the witness statements regarding the pedestrians crossing behaviours. The implications of PCSC could be significant once fully validated against further future accident data, as this method is reversible, allowing the computation of vehicle impact velocity from pedestrian crossing speed as well as verifying witness accounts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.020

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Anon, 1997, Study compares older and younger pedestrian walking speeds, Road. Saf. J.
  2. Bastien, 2017, Validation of a finite element human model throw distance in pedestrian accident scenarios Salzburg, Austria, 9/05/17-11/05/17, Paper Presented at 11th European LS-DYNA Conference
  3. Ravani, 1981, vol. 81, 791
  4. Wen, 2015, Stability and sensitivity of THUMS pedestrian model and its trauma response to a Real life accident Wutzburg, Germany, LS-Dyna European Conference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Bastien, C., Wellings, R., & Burnett, B.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University Hospital Coventry (GB)
Corresponding author
Bastien, C.
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
118
Pages
66-76
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2803470374
Cited by
12
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Coventry University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Road Transport and Highway Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
pedestrian crossing speed, vector algebra, vehicle damage, impact velocity, witness statements, traffic fatalities
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Pedestrians, Anthropometry, Humans, Motor Vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review