Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How can regulatory authorities improve safety in organizations by influencing safety culture? A conceptual model of the relationships and a discussion of implications

Nævestad, Tor-Olav, Storesund Hesjevoll, Ingeborg, Elvik, Rune·2021·Accident Analysis & Prevention
DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106228
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106228

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Antonsen, 2009, The relationship between culture and safety on offshore supply vessels, Saf. Sci., 47, 1118, 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.12.006 · DOI
  2. Antonsen, 2017, Regulating the intangible. Searching for safety culture in the Norwegian petroleum industry, Saf. Sci., 92, 232, 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.013 · DOI
  3. Bernard, 2018, Safety culture oversight: an intangible concept for tangible issues within nuclear installations, Safety, 4
  4. Bye, 2016, ‘Culture’ as a tool and stumbling block for learning: the function of ‘culture’ in communications from regulatory authorities in the Norwegian petroleum sector, Saf. Sci., 81, 68, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.015 · DOI
  5. De Winter, 2010, The Driver Behaviour Questionnaire as a predictor of accidents: a meta-analysis, J. Saf. Res., 41, 463, 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Elvik, 2016, Safety inspectorates and safety performance: a tentative analysis for aviation and rail in Norway. 11 s, Safety, 2, 10.3390/safety2020013 · doi:10.3390/safety2020013
  7. Flin, 2000, Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features, Saf. Sci., 34, 177, 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gregersen, 1996, Road safety improvement in large companies. An experimental comparison of different measures, Accid. Anal. Prev., 28, 297, 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00060-7 · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(95)00060-7
  9. Grote, 2012, Safety management in different high-risk domains – all the same?, Saf. Sci., 50, 1983, 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Grote, G. & Weichbrodt, J. (2013). “Why regulators should stay away from safety culture and stick to rules instead”, in Trapping Safety into Rules: How Desirable and Avoidable is Proceduralization of Safety?, Editors: Corinne Bieder, Mathilde Bourrier, pp. 225-240, Ashgate. · DOI
  11. Karlsen, J.E. H. Valen (2010) The social construction of HSE culture: A case study from the Norwegian petroleum industry, in Ale, Papaziglou, Zio (Eds.), Reliability, Risk and Safety, Taylor and Francis Group, London.
  12. Kongsvik, 2016, HSE culture in the petroleum industry: lost in translation?, Saf. Sci., 81, 81, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.019 · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.019
  13. Kringen, J. (2013). Proceruralization and regulation of culture: experiments on the frontiers of risk regulation, in C. Bieder, M. Bourrier (Eds.), Trapping Safety Into Rules. How Desirable or Avoidable Is Proceduralization?, Ashgate, Farnham.
  14. Kvalheim, 2016, Safety compliance and safety climate: A repeated cross-sectional study in the oil and gas industry, J. Saf. Res., 59, 33, 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.006 · DOI
  15. Le Coze, J.-C., Wiig, S. (2013). Beyond procedures: Can’Safety Culture’Be regulated? In: Bieder, C., Bourrier, M. (Eds.), Trapping Safety Into Rules. How Desirable or Avoidable Is Proceduralization? Ashgate, Farnham.
  16. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. (2009). PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement BMJ, 339. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Murray, W., Ison, S., Gallemore, P., Sing Nijjar, H. (2009). Effective Occupational Road Safety Programs. A case study of Wolseley. Transportation Research Record, NO: 2096, pp.55-64. · doi:10.3141/2096-08
  18. Naveh, 2015, A longitudinal study of an intervention to improve road safety climate: climate as an organizational boundary spanner, J. Appl. Psychol., 100, 216, 10.1037/a0037613 · DOI
  19. Nævestad, T.-O. (2010). Cultures, crises and campaigns: Examining the role of safety culture in the management of hazards in a high risk industry. Ph.D. dissertation, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo.
  20. Lappalainen, 2012, Evaluation of the ISM Code in the Finnish shipping companies, J. Maritime Res., 9, 23
  21. Nævestad, 2015, Traffic accidents triggered by drivers at work - a survey and analysis of contributing factors, Transport. Res. Part F: Psychol. Behav., 34, 94, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.024 · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.024
  22. Nævestad, 2018, How can we improve safety culture in transport organizations? A review of interventions, effects and influencing factors, Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 54, 28, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.002 · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.002
  23. Nævestad, 2019, Strategies regulatory authorities can use to influence safety culture in organizations: lessons based on experiences from three sectors, Saf. Sci., 118, 409, 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.020 · DOI
  24. Patankar (2019) Chapter 13 - Maintenance Resource Management for Technical Operations, in Kanki B.G. J. Anca and T.R. Chidester et al (eds.) Crew Resource Management (3.Ed), 357-405. · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812995-1.00013-0
  25. Thomas, M.J.W., 2012. A systematic review of the effectiveness of safety management systems. No. AR-2011-148. Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
  26. Weick, 1999, Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness, Res. Org. Behav., 21, 81
  27. Welsh, 2002, Dealing with data: using Nvivo in the qualitative data analysis process, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3
  28. Zohar, 2010, Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions, Accid. Anal. Prev., 42, 1517, 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.019 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Zuschlag, 2016, Evaluation of a safety culture intervention for Union Pacific show improved safety and safety culture, Saf. Sci., 83, 59, 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.001 · DOI

Cited by

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Nævestad, T.-O., Storesund Hesjevoll, I., & Elvik, R.
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
159
Pages
106228
ISSN
0001-4575
DOI
10.1016/j.aap.2021.106228
Cited by
26
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How can regulatory authorities improve safety in organizations by influencing safety culture? A conceptual model of the relationships and a discussion of implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106228
The paper
Nævestad, T.-O., Storesund Hesjevoll, I., & Elvik, R. (2021). How can regulatory authorities improve safety in organizations by influencing safety culture? A conceptual model of the relationships and a discussion of implications. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106228

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.