Cited by 21Amino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismBiochemical Acid Research StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Positive correlation between rat brain glutamate concentrations and mitochondrial 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase activity

Mkrtchyan, Garik V., Graf, Anastasia, Trofimova, Lidia, Ksenofontov, Alexander, Baratova, Ludmila, Bunik, Victoria·2018·Analytical Biochemistry

Abstract

Glutamate is a key metabolite and major excitatory neurotransmitter, degraded through transformation to 2-oxoglutarate which is further catabolized by 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (OGDHC). Both the glutamate excitotoxicity and impaired OGDHC activity are hallmarks of neurodegeneration. This work quantifies a relationship between the brain OGDHC activity and glutamate levels, assessing its diagnostic value to characterize (patho)physiology. A moderate to strong positive correlation of the two parameters determined under varied physiological settings (brain regions, seasons, gender, pregnancy, rat line), is revealed. Mitochondrial impairment (OGDHC inhibition or acute hypobaric hypoxia) decreases the interdependence, even when the parameter means do not change significantly. Compared to the cortex, the cerebellum exhibits a lower inter-individual glutamate variation and a weaker glutamate-OGDHC interdependence. Specific metabolism of the brain regions is also characterized by a positive correlation between glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations in the cortex but not in the cerebellum. In contrast, a strong positive correlation between glutamate and glutamine is present in both the cortex and cerebellum. The differences in metabolic correlations are in line with transcriptomics data which suggest that glutamate distribution between competitive pathways contributes to the brain-region-specific features of the interdependences of glutamate and OGDHC or GAB…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ab.2018.01.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mkrtchyan, G. V., Graf, A., Trofimova, L., Ksenofontov, A., Baratova, L., & Bunik, V.
Affiliations
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU)
Corresponding author
Bunik, Victoria
Venue
Analytical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
552
Pages
100-109
ISSN
0003-2697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2784236692
Cited by
21
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Biochemical Acid Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
glutamate, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial metabolism, brain regions, cerebellum, cerebral cortex, glutamine, hypobaric hypoxia, neurodegeneration, glutamate excitotoxicity, interindividual variability, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Female, Ketoglutarate Dehydrogenase Complex, Mitochondria, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Glutamic Acid, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review