CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 88

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biopersistent fiber-induced inflammation and carcinogenesis: Lessons learned from asbestos toward safety of fibrous nanomaterials

Nagai, Hirotaka, Toyokuni, Shinya·2010·Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
DOI 10.1016/j.abb.2010.06.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Nano-sized durable fibrous materials such as carbon nanotubes have raised safety concerns similar to those raised by asbestos. However, the mechanism by which particulates with ultrafine structure cause inflammation and ultimately cancer (e.g. malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer) is largely unknown. This is partially because the particulates are not uniform and they vary in a plethora of factors. Such variances include length, diameter, surface area, density, shape, contaminant metals (including iron) and crystallinity. Each of these factors is involved in particulate toxicity both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, the elicited biological responses are incredibly complicated. Various kinds of fibers were evaluated with different cells, animals and methods. The aim of this review is to concisely summarize previous reports from the standpoint that activation of macrophages and mesothelial injury are the two major mechanisms of inflammation and possibly cancer. Importantly, these two mechanisms appear to be interacting with each other. However, there is a lack of data on the interplay of macrophage and mesothelium especially in vivo. Since fibrous nanomaterials present potential applications in various fields, it is necessary to develop standard evaluation methods to minimize risks for human health.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.abb.2010.06.015

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Robinson, 2005, N. Engl. J. Med., 353, 1591, 10.1056/NEJMra050152 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Stanton, 1981, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 67, 965
  3. Donaldson, 2006, Toxicol. Sci., 92, 5, 10.1093/toxsci/kfj130 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Iijima, 1991, Nature, 354, 56, 10.1038/354056a0 · DOI
  5. Takagi, 2008, J. Toxicol. Sci., 33, 105, 10.2131/jts.33.105 · DOI
  6. Sakamoto, 2009, J. Toxicol. Sci., 34, 65, 10.2131/jts.34.65 · DOI
  7. Poland, 2008, Nat. Nanotechnol., 3, 423, 10.1038/nnano.2008.111 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Addison, 1990, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 34, 159
  9. Kamp, 1992, Free Radic. Biol. Med., 12, 293, 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90117-Y · DOI · Paper page
  10. McDonald, 1982, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 26, 417
  11. Wang, 1987, Am. J. Pathol., 126, 343
  12. Ozaki, 1988, Biochem. J., 250, 589, 10.1042/bj2500589 · DOI
  13. Balkwill, 2005, Cancer Cell, 7, 211, 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Yang, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 10397, 10.1073/pnas.0604008103 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Toyokuni, 1998, Biotherapy, 11, 147, 10.1023/A:1007934229968 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Xio, 1995, Oncogene, 11, 511
  17. Toyokuni, 2009, Nagoya J. Med. Sci., 71, 1
  18. Jorio, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 1118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1118 · DOI
  19. Endo, 1992, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 6941, 10.1021/j100196a017 · DOI
  20. Ryman-Rasmussen, 2009, Nat. Nanotechnol., 4, 747, 10.1038/nnano.2009.305 · DOI
  21. Maxim, 2001, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 33, 319, 10.1006/rtph.2001.1467 · DOI
  22. Donaldson, 1989, Br. J. Ind. Med., 46, 271
  23. Pulskamp, 2007, Toxicol. Lett., 168, 58, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.11.001 · DOI
  24. Sayes, 2006, Toxicol. Lett., 161, 135, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.08.011 · DOI
  25. Wick, 2007, Toxicol. Lett., 168, 121, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.08.019 · DOI
  26. Donaldson, 2010, Part Fibre Toxicol., 7, 5, 10.1186/1743-8977-7-5 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Koo, 2008, Cell. Microbiol., 10, 1866, 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01177.x · DOI
  28. Moalli, 1987, Am. J. Pathol., 128, 426
  29. Morgan, 1978, Br. J. Ind. Med., 35, 146
  30. Churg, 1992, Int. J. Exp. Pathol., 73, 287
  31. Zhang, 2008, J. Pathol., 214, 161, 10.1002/path.2284 · DOI
  32. Sumimoto, 2008, FEBS J., 275, 3249, 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06488.x · DOI
  33. Muller, 2005, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 207, 221, 10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Mitchell, 2007, Toxicol. Sci., 100, 203, 10.1093/toxsci/kfm196 · DOI
  35. Fenoglio, 2008, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 21, 1690, 10.1021/tx800100s · DOI
  36. Fraczek, 2008, Acta Biomater., 4, 1593, 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.018 · DOI
  37. Inoue, 2008, Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood), 233, 1583, 10.3181/0805-RM-179 · DOI
  38. Mitchell, 2009, Nat. Nanotechnol., 4, 451, 10.1038/nnano.2009.151 · DOI
  39. Park, 2009, Toxicology, 259, 113, 10.1016/j.tox.2009.02.009 · DOI
  40. Inoue, 2009, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 237, 306, 10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.003 · DOI
  41. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, 2009, Toxicology, 266, 16, 10.1016/j.tox.2009.10.007 · DOI
  42. Nygaard, 2009, Toxicol. Sci., 109, 113, 10.1093/toxsci/kfp057 · DOI
  43. M.F. Cesta, J.P. Ryman-Rasmussen, D.G. Wallace, T. Masinde, G. Hurlburt, A.J. Taylor, J.C. Bonner, Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., in press, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2009-0113OC. · DOI
  44. Sato, 2005, Mol. Biosyst., 1, 176, 10.1039/b502429c · DOI
  45. Hirano, 2008, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 232, 244, 10.1016/j.taap.2008.06.016 · DOI
  46. Cheng, 2009, Biomaterials, 30, 4152, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.019 · DOI
  47. Haniu, 2009, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 242, 256, 10.1016/j.taap.2009.10.015 · DOI
  48. Palomaki, 2009, Toxicology, 267, 125, 10.1016/j.tox.2009.10.034 · DOI
  49. Monteiro-Riviere, 2005, Toxicol. Lett., 155, 377, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.11.004 · DOI
  50. Witzmann, 2006, Nanomedicine, 2, 158, 10.1016/j.nano.2006.07.005 · DOI
  51. Rotoli, 2008, Toxicol. Lett., 178, 95, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.02.007 · DOI
  52. Garza, 2008, Int. J. Nanomed., 3, 83
  53. Karlsson, 2008, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 21, 1726, 10.1021/tx800064j · DOI · Paper page
  54. Simon-Deckers, 2008, Toxicology, 253, 137, 10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.007 · DOI
  55. Tabet, 2009, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A, 72, 60, 10.1080/15287390802476991 · DOI
  56. Lindberg, 2009, Toxicol. Lett., 186, 166, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.11.019 · DOI
  57. Ravichandran, 2009, J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol., 23, 333, 10.1002/jbt.20296 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 88

Metadata

Authors
Nagai, H., & Toyokuni, S.
Venue
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
502
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0003-9861
DOI
10.1016/j.abb.2010.06.015
Cited by
88
References
8
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  • Takeda Science Foundation
  • Japan Chemical Industry Association

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review