Cited by 106Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesAnesthesia and Pain ManagementDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Safety of local anesthetics

Open access
Cherobin, Ana Carolina Figueiredo Pereira, Tavares, Glaysson Tassara·2020·Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

Abstract

Local anesthetics are essential medications for the conduction of dermatological procedures. They stop the depolarization of nerve fibers and are divided into two main categories, the amide and ester types. Systemic toxicity with reflex on the central nervous and cardiovascular systems is their most feared adverse reactions, and the anaphylactic reaction is the most concerning one. Although potentially fatal, these events are extremely rare, so local anesthetics are considered safe for use in in-office procedures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.abd.2019.09.025

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The performance of the procedures with local anesthesia and vasoconstrictors (100 cases) in the outpatient setting (95 cases) did not show an increase in risks or complications for the patients.

    “The performance of the procedures with local anesthesia and vasoconstrictors (100 cases) in the outpatient setting (95 cases) did not show an increase in risks or complications for the patients, data that have been well established in the literature.17, 18, 19, 20, 21”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cherobin, A. C. F. P., & Tavares, G. T.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Cherobin, Ana Carolina Figueiredo Pereira
Venue
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
82-90
ISSN
0365-0596 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996089471
Cited by
106
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
local anesthetics, local anesthetic safety, amide local anesthetics, ester local anesthetics, systemic toxicity, central nervous system toxicity, cardiotoxicity, anaphylaxis, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Anesthetics, Local, Bupivacaine, Drug Hypersensitivity, Epinephrine, Humans, Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, Risk Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review