CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 98Analytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction for the determination of quinolones in swine muscle by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection

Tsai, Wen-Hsien, Chuang, Hung-Yi, Chen, Ho-Hsien, Huang, Joh-Jong, Chen, Hwi-Chang, Cheng, Shou-Hsun, Huang, Tzou-Chi·2009·Analytica Chimica Acta
DOI 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction (DMSPE) are two simple and low-cost sample preparation methods for liquid samples. In this work, these two methods were applied to solid tissue sample for the determination of seven quinolones by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). After the homogenization of the swine muscle with acetonitrile and salt-promoted partitioning, small amounts of the extract were used for the DLLME and DMSPE methods. In the DLLME approach, the target analytes in the extraction solvent were rapidly extracted into a small volume of dichloromethane for drying and the residue was reconstituted for HPLC-DAD analysis. In the DMSPE approach, the target analytes in the extraction solvent were trapped by dispersive silica-based PSA (primary and secondary amine) sorbents and desorbed into a small amount of desorption solution for HPLC-DAD analysis. Under the optimal conditions, relative recoveries were determined for swine muscle spiked 50-200 microg kg(-1) and quantification was achieved by matrix-matched calibration. The calibration curves of seven quinolones showed linearity with a correlation coefficient value above 0.998 for both approaches. Relative recoveries ranged from 93.0 to 104.7% and from 95.5 to 111.0% for DLLME and DMSPE, respectively. Limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 5.6 to 23.8 microg kg(-1) and from 7.5 to 26.3 microg kg(-1) for DLLME and DMSPE, respe…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Andreu, 2007, Trends Anal. Chem., 26, 534, 10.1016/j.trac.2007.01.010 · DOI
  2. Su, 2003, J. Food Drug Anal., 11, 114
  3. Hernandez-Arteseros, 2002, J. Chromatogr. A, 945, 1, 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01505-9 · DOI
  4. Ridgway, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1153, 36, 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.134 · DOI
  5. Smith, 2003, J. Chromatogr. A, 1000, 3, 10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00511-9 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cacho, 1992, Anal. Chim. Acta, 264, 311, 10.1016/0003-2670(92)87020-L · DOI
  7. Guidotti, 1996, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 19, 469, 10.1002/jhrc.1240190812 · DOI
  8. He, 1997, Anal. Chem., 69, 4634, 10.1021/ac970242q · DOI
  9. Wang, 1998, Anal. Chem., 70, 4610, 10.1021/ac9804339 · DOI
  10. Ahmadi, 2006, J. Chromatogr. A, 1101, 307, 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.11.017 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jeannot, 1997, Anal. Chem., 69, 235, 10.1021/ac960814r · DOI
  12. Berijani, 2006, J. Chromatogr. A, 1123, 1, 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Zhao, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1175, 137, 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.10.069 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fontanals, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1152, 14, 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.077 · DOI
  15. Posyniak, 2005, J. Chromatogr. A, 1088, 169, 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.01.007 · DOI
  16. Anderson, 2005, J. Chromatogr. A, 1075, 23, 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.04.013 · DOI
  17. Tsai, 2009, J. Chromatogr. A, 1216, 2263, 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.034 · DOI
  18. Lord, 2000, J. Chromatogr. A, 885, 153, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00535-5 · DOI
  19. Ouyang, 2006, Trends Anal. Chem., 25, 692, 10.1016/j.trac.2006.05.005 · DOI
  20. Herranz, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1140, 63, 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.058 · DOI
  21. Carretero, 2008, J. Chromatogr. A, 1209, 162, 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.011 · DOI
  22. Hermo, 2005, Anal. Chim. Acta, 539, 77, 10.1016/j.aca.2005.02.070 · DOI
  23. Huang, 2006, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 384, 1228, 10.1007/s00216-005-0270-8 · DOI
  24. Yan, 2007, Anal. Chem., 79, 8242, 10.1021/ac070644q · DOI
  25. Fan, 2007, Talanta, 72, 1618, 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.01.034 · DOI
  26. Lolo, 2005, J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 2849, 10.1021/jf048015u · DOI
  27. Anastassiades, 2003, J. AOAC Int., 86, 412, 10.1093/jaoac/86.2.412 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Hernando, 2006, Anal. Chim. Acta, 562, 176, 10.1016/j.aca.2006.01.075 · DOI
  29. Liu, 2005, J. Chromatogr. A, 1097, 183, 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.10.022 · DOI
  30. Karbiwnyk, 2007, Anal. Chim. Acta, 596, 257, 10.1016/j.aca.2007.06.018 · DOI
  31. Van Hoof, 2005, Anal. Chim. Acta, 529, 265, 10.1016/j.aca.2004.07.055 · DOI
  32. Bailac, 2006, Anal. Chim. Acta, 580, 163, 10.1016/j.aca.2006.07.064 · DOI
  33. Hermo, 2006, J. Chromatogr. A, 1104, 132, 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.11.080 · DOI
  34. Zhao, 2007, J. Agric. Food Chem., 55, 3829, 10.1021/jf0635309 · DOI
  35. Hassouan, 2007, J. Chromatogr. B, 852, 625, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.12.039 · DOI
  36. Wei, 2007, J. Chromatogr. A, 1163, 333, 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.06.052 · DOI
  37. Aguilera-Luiz, 2008, J. Chromatogr. A, 1205, 10, 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.07.066 · DOI
  38. Granelli, 2007, Anal. Chim. Acta, 586, 289, 10.1016/j.aca.2006.12.014 · DOI
  39. Marazuela, 2009, Anal. Chim. Acta, 645, 5, 10.1016/j.aca.2009.04.031 · DOI
  40. Horie, 1995, J. Food Hyg. Soc. Jpn., 36, 62, 10.3358/shokueishi.36.62 · DOI
  41. Quiming, 2007, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rel. Technol., 30, 1343, 10.1080/10826070701276465 · DOI
  42. W.H. Tsai, T.C. Huang, H.H. Chen, J.J. Huang, H.Y. Chuang, J. Chromatogr. A., in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 98

Metadata

Authors
Tsai, W.-H., Chuang, H.-Y., Chen, H.-H., Huang, J.-J., Chen, H.-C., Cheng, S.-H., & Huang, T.-C.
Affiliations
  • National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW)
Corresponding author
Huang, Tzou-Chi
ORCID
Venue
Analytica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
656
Issue
1-2
Pages
56-62
ISSN
0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.008
OpenAlex
W2013652455
Cited by
98
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
quinolones, swine muscle, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, dispersive micro-solid phase extraction, veterinary drug residues, sample preparation, matrix-matched calibration, food safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Calibration, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Chemical Fractionation, Muscles, Solvents, Swine, Quinolones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review