Cited by 325Analytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water samples by single drop microextraction and gas chromatography-flame photometric detector

Ahmadi, F., Assadi, Y., Hosseini, S.M.R. Milani, Rezaee, M.·2006·Journal of Chromatography A

Abstract

In this paper we have developed single drop microextraction (SDME) with modified 1.00 microl microsyringe, followed by gas chromatography with flame photometric detector (GC-FPD) for determination of 13 organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in water samples. By using a 1.00 microl microsyringe the repeatability of drop volume and injection were improved, because of using maximum volume of microsyringe and no dead volume. On the other hand, the modification of needle tip caused increasing cross section of needle tip and increasing adhesion force between needle tip and drop, thereby increasing drop stability and achieving a higher stirrer speed (up to 1700 rpm). The method used 0.9 microl of carbon tetrachloride as extractant solvent, 40 min extraction time, stirring at 1300 rpm and no salt addition. The enrichment factor of this method ranged from 540 to 830. The linear ranges were 0.01-100 microg/l (four orders of magnitude) and limits of detection were 0.001-0.005 microg/l for most of analyte. The relative standard deviation (RSD%) for 2 microg/l of OPPs in water by using internal standard was in the range 1.1-8.6% (n = 5). The recoveries of OPPs from farm water at spiking level of 1.0 microg/l were 91-104%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.11.017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmadi, F., Assadi, Y., Hosseini, S. M. R. M., & Rezaee, M.
Affiliations
Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Assadi, Y.
Venue
Journal of Chromatography A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
1101
Issue
1-2
Pages
307-312
ISSN
0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995714425
Cited by
325
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
FWCI
15.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Iran University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
organophosphorus pesticides, single-drop microextraction, water analysis, carbon tetrachloride extraction, drop stability, enrichment factor, flame photometric detection
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Gas, Chemical Fractionation, Microchemistry, Organophosphorus Compounds, Pesticide Residues, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review