Capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry as a highly selective tool for the compositional and site-specific assessment of multiple peptide-deamidation
Open accessAbstract
Site-specific mapping of multiple deamidations in peptides is a challenging analytical task. In this work, capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry (CE-MS/MS) is presented as a high-resolution tool for the detailed characterization of these subtle modifications in peptides. The 4.5-kDa peptide drug TRI-1144, which contains five closely-positioned potential deamidation sites, was selected as model compound. TRI-1144 was exposed to acidic conditions and/or elevated temperatures for 1-14 h. Stressed samples were analyzed using a background electrolyte (BGE) of 150 mM ammonium formate (pH 6.0) in combination with a capillary coated with a bilayer of Polybrene-dextran sulfate. Separation of deamidated and deacetylated TRI-1144 species, including several positional isomers, was greatly enhanced by adding up to 40 vol% of acetonitrile-isopropanol (87.5:12.5, v/v) to the BGE, allowing reliable determination of the number of deamidations/deacetylations per degradation product. Collision-induced dissociation MS/MS was conducted on the separated peptide components in order to reveal the exact position of deamidation on the peptide chain. Obtained fragment ions showed overlapping isotopic distributions in their MS/MS spectra resulting from the comigration of different isomeric deamidated species. Comparison of theoretical and measured isotope distributions for specific y ions of peptide fragments yielded the identity and relative abundance of isomeric deamidated products. The developed CE-MS/MS methodology was used for the highly selective evaluation of TRI-1144 stability under different stress conditions, providing detailed qualitative and semi-quantitative degradation maps of the peptide drug.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding 40% acetonitrile-propan-2-ol (87.5:12.5) to 60% 150 mM ammonium formate at pH 6.0 significantly improved separation of deamidated and deacetylated TRI-1144 species and positional isomers.
“The addition of 40% of acetonitrile-propan-2-ol (87.5:12.5) to 60% 150mM ammonium formate (pH 6.0) significantly improved the separation of deamidated and deacetylated TRI-1144 species and positional isomers.”
From Recent trends of capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry in proteomics research (2019) · cites this paper as [103]
A polybrene coated capillary achieved fast and reproducible separations for compositional and site-specific assessment of multiple peptide-deamidation.
“The capillary was evaluated for the analysis of compositional and site-specific assessment of multiple peptide-deamidation where fast and reproducible separations were achieved.”
From Recent trends of capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry in proteomics research (2019) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Muneeruddin, K., Nazzaro, M., & Kaltashov, I. A. (2015) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02982 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Bush, D. R., Zang, L., Belov, A. M., Ivanov, A. R., & Karger, B. L. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03218 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Sarg, B., Faserl, K., Kremser, L., Halfinger, B., Sebastiano, R., & Lindner, H. H. (2013) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m112.024109 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent trends of capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry in proteomics research
Gomes, F. P., & Yates, J. R. (2019) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21599 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dominguez-Vega, E., De Vijlder, T., Romijn, E. P., & Somsen, G. W.
- Affiliations
- Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Analytica Chimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 982
- Pages
- 122-130
- ISSN
- 0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2720214279
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (IWT-450258)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- degradation products, regioisomers
- MeSH terms
- Peptides, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review