Cited by 117Library Science and Information LiteracyHigher Education Research StudiesLibrary Science and Information

Return on Investment: Libraries and Student Retention

Mezick, Elizabeth M.·2007·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mezick, E. M.
Affiliations
Long Island University (US)
Corresponding author
Mezick, Elizabeth M.
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
561-566
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970269259
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
academic libraries, student retention, library expenditures, serials costs, student persistence, doctoral-granting institutions, return on investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review