Cited by 30Library Science and Information LiteracyHigher Education Research StudiesLibrary Science and Information

Factors Predicting the Importance of Libraries and Research Activities for Undergraduates

Soria, Krista M.·2013·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of students enrolled in nearly 200 courses at a single university, students who read more, measured by borrowing books and accessing electronic resources, achieved better grades.

    “In a study investigating library usage patterns and academic achievement of students enrolled in nearly 200 courses at a single university, findings suggested that students who read more, measured in terms of borrowing books and accessing electronic resources, achieved better grades.11”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soria, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Soria, Krista M.
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
464-470
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039849759
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
undergraduate students, library use, research participation, academic libraries, scientific careers, academic engagement, faculty-student interaction, library user satisfaction, library skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review