Cited by 62Library Science and AdministrationLibrary Science and InformationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

Intentional integration of diversity ideals in academic libraries: A literature review

Cruz, Alice M.·2019·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Cruz, A. M.
Affiliations
Oakland University (US)
Corresponding author
Cruz, Alice M.
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
220-227
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921175007
Cited by
62
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9
FWCI
72.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
diversity and inclusion, academic libraries, library staffing, library culture, library resources, library services, library programming, librarian professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review