Cited by 83Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Predatory and Exploitative Behaviour in Academic Publishing: An Assessment

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., Dobránszki, Judit, Tsigaris, Panagiotis, Al-Khatib, Aceil·2019·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Dobránszki, J., Tsigaris, P., & Al-Khatib, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
  • Thompson Rivers University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Dobránszki, Judit
  • Tsigaris, Panagiotis
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
102071
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981308303
Cited by
77
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
44.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
predatory publishing, predatory journals, predatory publishers, open access publishing, deontology, moral wrongness, Jeffrey Beall, publication ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review