Perceptions of artificial intelligence: A survey of academic librarians in Canada and the United States
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has been little research in the library field on how students use generative AI for academic work as it relates to libraries.
“There has been little research in the library field on how students use generative AI for academic work as it relates to libraries.”
From A Survey on Student Use of Generative AI Chatbots for Academic Research (2024) · cites this paper as Hervieux and Wheatley (2021)
Many library vendors are already promoting AI as part of their products.
“Meanwhile, many library vendors are already promoting AI as part of their products (Hervieux & Wheatley, 2021).”
From Representation of Libraries in Artificial Intelligence Regulations and Implications for Ethics and Practice (2022) · cites this paper as Hervieux & Wheatley, 2021
At the current time, librarians have a range of views about AI from embracing its potential to deep scepticism and alarm.
“At the current time, librarians have a range of views about AI from embracing its potential to deep scepticism and alarm.”
From Representation of Libraries in Artificial Intelligence Regulations and Implications for Ethics and Practice (2022) · cites this paper as Hervieux & Wheatley, 2021
Other findings indicate the potential of training, rather than instances where training is already taking place.
“Other findings also indicate the potential of training, rather than instances where training is already taking place (Hervieux & Wheatley, 2021)”
From Representation of Libraries in Artificial Intelligence Regulations and Implications for Ethics and Practice (2022) · cites this paper as Hervieux & Wheatley, 2021
Cites
Talk to me: Exploring user interactions with the Amazon Alexa
Lopatovska, I., Rink, K., Knight, I., Raines, K., Cosenza, K., Williams, H., Sorsche, P., Hirsch, D., Li, Q., & Martinez, A. (2019) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/0961000618759414 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in academic libraries: An environmental scan
Wheatley, A., & Hervieux, S. (2019) · Information Services and Use · doi:10.3233/isu-190065 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Application of artificial intelligence in medical technologies: a systematic review of main trends.
Bitkina, O. V., Park, J., & Kim, H. K. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231189331 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A Survey on Student Use of Generative AI Chatbots for Academic Research
Deschenes, A., & McMahon, M. (2024) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/eblip30512 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Bradley, F. (2022) · Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association · doi:10.1080/24750158.2022.2101911 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Meanwhile, many library vendors are already promoting AI as part of their products (Hervieux & Wheatley, 2021).”
BackgroundPeekhaus, W. (2026) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103198 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hervieux, S., & Wheatley, A.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Wheatley, Amanda
- Venue
- The Journal of Academic Librarianship
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102270
- ISSN
- 0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3101874461
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, academic librarians, librarian perceptions, library services, library workflows, library users, artificial intelligence in libraries, definition of artificial intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
