Cited by 298AI in Service InteractionsSpeech and dialogue systemsUsability and User Interface Design

Talk to me: Exploring user interactions with the Amazon Alexa

Lopatovska, Irene, Rink, Katrina, Knight, Ian, Raines, Kieran, Cosenza, Kevin, Williams, Harriet, Sorsche, Perachya, Hirsch, David +2 more·2019·Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

Abstract

Amazon Alexa is a voice-controlled application that is rapidly gaining popularity. We examined user interactions with this technology, and focused on the types of tasks requested of Alexa, the variables that affect user behaviors with Alexa, and Alexa’s alternatives. The data about Alexa usage were collected from 19 participants via the online questionnaire and diary methods over the course of several days. The results indicate that across all age groups, Alexa was primarily used for checking weather forecasts, playing music, and controlling other devices. Several participants reported using Apple Siri and Google Now applications in addition to Alexa for similar purposes except for controlling other devices. Alexa uses over the weekends were more frequent than on weekdays, but its overall usage tended to decrease over time. The users reported being satisfied with Alexa even when it did not produce sought information, suggesting that the interaction experience is more important to the users than the interaction output. More work is required to understand whether users treat Alexa and similar voice-controlled applications as primarily a traditional information retrieval system, a casual leisure system, a control interface for smart home devices, or, simply, a new toy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0961000618759414

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopatovska, I., Rink, K., Knight, I., Raines, K., Cosenza, K., Williams, H., Sorsche, P., Hirsch, D., Li, Q., & Martinez, A.
Affiliations
Pratt Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Lopatovska, Irene
Venue
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2018-03-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
984-997
ISSN
  • 0022-2232 (ISSN-L)
  • 0961-0006
  • 1741-6477
OpenAlex
W2794297522
Cited by
298
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 6
FWCI
17.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
Amazon Alexa, voice assistants, user interaction, task type, user satisfaction, weather forecasting, music playback, Siri, usage patterns, age differences, information retrieval systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review