Cited by 18Research Data Management PracticesLibrary Science and InformationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Readiness towards the implementation of open science initiatives in the Malaysian Comprehensive Public Universities

Ahmed, Mahfooz, Othman, Roslina·2021·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102368

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, M., & Othman, R.
Affiliations
International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Mahfooz
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
102368
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157967855
Cited by
17
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
  • The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
International Islamic University Malaysia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
open science, implementation readiness, Malaysian public universities, institutional repositories, open data, open collaboration, open innovation, academic libraries, science policy, scholarly communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review