Cited by 29Library Science and Information LiteracyResearch Data Management PracticesLibrary Science and Information

Data competency for academic librarians: Evaluating present trends and future prospects

Luo, Jiebei, Tang, Rong·2024·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102897

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, J., & Tang, R.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Simmons University (US)
Corresponding author
Luo, Jiebei
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
102897
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399041404
Cited by
15
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
17.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
data competencies, academic librarians, librarian roles, data visualization, data management, collection development, professional development, library and information science education, curriculum gaps, librarian perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review