Cited by 13scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic integrity and plagiarismMisinformation and Its Impacts

The citation catastrophe: Propagation of AI-generated counterfeit citations in scholarship

Camp, Nathan T., Bengtson, Jason A., Sandstrom, John C.·2025·The Journal of Academic Librarianship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103065

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Business Information Review (n.d.). Submission guidelines. https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/BIR.
  2. Burtsev, 2023, The working limitations of large language models, MIT Sloan Management Review, 65
  3. Fake., 1924, Time Magazine, 4, 21
  4. Library Hi Tech News (n.d.-a). Author guidelines. https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/lhtn.
  5. Library Hi Tech News (n.d.-b). Reviewer information. https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/lhtn.
  6. Metcalfe, 1995, Metcalfe’s Law: A network becomes more valuable as it reaches more users, InfoWorld, 17, 53
  7. Smith, 1981, Citation analysis, Library Trends, 30, 83

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camp, N. T., Bengtson, J. A., & Sandstrom, J. C.
Affiliations
New Mexico State University (US)
Corresponding author
Camp, Nathan T.
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
103065
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410253511
Cited by
12
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 1
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
AI-generated citations, large language models, citation indexes, citation metrics, academic integrity, citation fraud

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review