The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee
Abstract
Symptom exaggeration or fabrication occurs in a sizeable minority of neuropsychological examinees, with greater prevalence in forensic contexts. Adequate assessment of response validity is essential in order to maximize confidence in the results of neurocognitive and personality measures and in the diagnoses and recommendations that are based on the results. Symptom validity assessment may include specific tests, indices, and observations. The manner in which symptom validity is assessed may vary depending on context but must include a thorough examination of cultural factors. Assessment of response validity, as a component of a medically necessary evaluation, is medically necessary. When determined by the neuropsychologist to be necessary for the assessment of response validity, administration of specific symptom validity tests are also medically necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-y;ft545 · Cited by 970
Cited by
Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Participants1, C. (2009) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854040903155063 · Cited by 869
Performance Validity and Symptom Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment
Larrabee, G. J. (2012) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617712000240 · Cited by 428
Neuropsychologists’ Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals
Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597 · Cited by 339
Identifying students faking ADHD: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection
HARRISON, A., EDWARDS, M., & PARKER, K. (2007) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.03.008 · Cited by 185
Bauer, R. M., Iverson, G. L., Cernich, A. N., Binder, L. M., Ruff, R. M., & Naugle, R. I. (2012) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2012.663001 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BUSH, S., RUFF, R., TROSTER, A., BARTH, J., KOFFLER, S., PLISKIN, N., REYNOLDS, C., & SILVER, C.
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 419-426
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117583832
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002
- The paper
- BUSH, S., RUFF, R., TROSTER, A., BARTH, J., KOFFLER, S., PLISKIN, N., REYNOLDS, C., & SILVER, C. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
