Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unique crystallographic texture formation in Inconel 718 by laser powder bed fusion and its effect on mechanical anisotropy

Open access
Gokcekaya, Ozkan, Ishimoto, Takuya, Hibino, Shinya, Yasutomi, Jumpei, Narushima, Takayuki, Nakano, Takayoshi·2021·Acta Materialia

Abstract

Additive manufacturing offers an exclusive way of anisotropic microstructure control with a high degree of freedom regarding variation in process parameters. This study demonstrates a unique texture formation in Inconel 718 (IN718) using a bidirectional laser scan in a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process for tailoring the mechanical properties. We developed three distinctive textures in IN718 using LPBF: a single-crystal-like microstructure (SCM) with a <110> orientation in the build direction (BD), crystallographic lamellar microstructure (CLM) with a <110>-oriented main layer and <100>-oriented sub-layer in the BD, and polycrystalline with a weak orientation. The microstructure observations and finite element simulations showed that the texture evolution of the SCM and CLM was dominated by the melt-pool shape and related heat-flow direction. The specimen with CLM exhibited a simultaneous improvement in strength and ductility owing to the stress-transfer coefficient between the <110>-oriented main and <100>-oriented sub-grains, showing superior mechanical properties compared to cast-IN718. This behavior is largely attributed to the presence of the boundary between the main and sub-layers (crystallographic grain boundary) lying parallel to the BD uniquely formed under the LPBF process. Furthermore, the strength–ductility balance of the part with the CLM can be controlled by changing the stress-transfer coefficient and the Schmidt factor through an alteration of the loading axis. Control of the crystallographic texture, including the CLM formation, is beneficial for tailoring and improving the mechanical performance of the structural materials, which can be a promising methodology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116876

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
Gokcekaya, O., Ishimoto, T., Hibino, S., Yasutomi, J., Narushima, T., & Nakano, T.
Venue
Acta Materialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
212
Pages
116876
ISSN
1359-6454 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3155382531
Cited by
459
References
32
FWCI
27.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unique crystallographic texture formation in Inconel 718 by laser powder bed fusion and its effect on mechanical anisotropy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116876
The paper
Gokcekaya, O., Ishimoto, T., Hibino, S., Yasutomi, J., Narushima, T., & Nakano, T. (2021). Unique crystallographic texture formation in Inconel 718 by laser powder bed fusion and its effect on mechanical anisotropy. Acta Materialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116876

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.