Cited by 110Helminth infection and controlParasites and Host InteractionsParasite Biology and Host Interactions

Trichuris suis and Trichuris trichiura are different nematode species

Cutillas, C., Callejón, R., de Rojas, M., Tewes, B., Ubeda, J.M., Ariza, C., Guevara, D.C.·2009·Acta Tropica

Abstract

In this paper, a morphological and biometrical study by optical microscopy and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) of Trichuris suis isolated from different hosts (Sus scrofa domestica and Sus scrofa scrofa) and Trichuris trichiura isolated from chimpanzee, has been carried out. Our results demonstrate the existence of typical pericloacal papillae in both species. Biometrical parameters of T. suis and T. trichiura overlapped but males and females of T. trichiura tended to be shorter and thinner than those of T. suis. Our results suggest that T. suis and T. trichiura cannot be differentiated using standard procedures as morphological and biometrical determinations. Thus, the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the ribosomal DNA was sequenced to allow a differentiation between T. suis and T. trichiura on genetic level. The ITS1 and ITS2 sequences derived from T. trichiura eggs isolated from feces of primates (Colobus guereza kikuyensis and Nomascus gabriellae) showed clear differences to the respective sequences of T. suis derived from eggs of different porcine hosts. The 5.8S gene was similar between the two species. Sequences obtained from different populations of the same species showed no significant differences indicating that the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences reported in this study are representative for T. trichiura and T. suis, respectively. Phylogenetic relationships have been determined attending to the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences from different species of the genus Trichuris. In conclusion, T. trichiura and T. suis are considered to be closely related but genetically different species. Both species can be easily and reliably distinguished by a PCR-RFLP analysis of the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences with different restriction enzymes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.05.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 110

Authors
Cutillas, C., Callejón, R., de Rojas, M., Tewes, B., Ubeda, J. M., Ariza, C., & Guevara, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
  • Dr Falk Pharma (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Cutillas, C.
Venue
Acta Tropica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
299-307
ISSN
0001-706X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045420024
Cited by
110
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Tropica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (CGL2004-00630/BOS)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Keywords
Trichuris suis, Trichuris trichiura, species differentiation, nematode morphology, ribosomal DNA, phylogenetic relationships, PCR-RFLP, pigs, chimpanzees, primates, Colobus guereza, Nomascus gabriellae, Trichuris
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Pan troglodytes, Female, Male, Microscopy, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S, Trichuriasis, Trichuris, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Homology, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Helminth, DNA, Intergenic, Sus scrofa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review