The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial action of a novel functionalized chitosan-arginine against Gram-negative bacteria
Open accessAbstract
The antimicrobial activity of chitosan and chitosan derivatives has been well established. However, although several mechanisms have been proposed, the exact mode of action is still unclear. Here we report on the investigation of antibacterial activity and the antibacterial mode of action of a novel water-soluble chitosan derivative, arginine-functionalized chitosan, on the gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens and Escherichia coli. Two different arginine-functionalized chitosans (6% arginine-substituted and 30% arginine-substituted) each strongly inhibited P. fluorescens and E. coli growth. Time-dependent killing efficacy experiments showed that 5000 mg L-1 of 6% substituted and 30% substituted chitosan-arginine killed 2.7 logs and 4.5 logs of P. fluorescens, and 4.8 logs and 4.6 logs of E. coli in 4 h, respectively. At low concentrations, the 6% substituted chitosan-arginine was more effective in inhibiting cell growth even though the 30% substituted chitosan-arginine appeared to be more effective in permeabilizing the cell membranes of both P. fluorescens and E. coli. Studies using fluorescent probes, 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN), nile red (NR) and propidium iodide (PI), and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) suggest that chitosan-arginine's antibacterial activity is, at least in part, due to its interaction with the cell membrane, in which it increases membrane permeability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations
Andrews, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5 · Cited by 4,129
Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane
Vaara, M. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.56.3.395-411.1992 · Cited by 1,879
Insights into the mode of action of chitosan as an antibacterial compound.
Raafat, D., von Bargen, K., Haas, A., & Sahl, H.-G. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00453-08 · Cited by 888
Cited by
Chitosan preparations for wounds and burns: antimicrobial and wound-healing effects
Dai, T., Tanaka, M., Huang, Y.-Y., & Hamblin, M. R. (2011) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1586/eri.11.59 · Cited by 963
Harugade, A., Sherje, A. P., & Pethe, A. (2023) · Reactive and Functional Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2023.105634 · Cited by 474
Progress and prospects in chitosan derivatives: Modification strategies and medical applications
Ding, S., Wang, Y., Li, J., & Chen, S. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.12.008 · Cited by 92
Cationic polymers and their self-assembly for antibacterial applications
Deka, S., Sharma, A., & Kumar, P. (2015) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026615666150330110602 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, H., Zhang, P., Kieft, T. L., Ryan, S. J., Baker, S. M., Wiesmann, W. P., & Rogelj, S.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2562-2571
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983722882
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial action of a novel functionalized chitosan-arginine against Gram-negative bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.002
- The paper
- Tang, H., Zhang, P., Kieft, T. L., Ryan, S. J., Baker, S. M., Wiesmann, W. P., & Rogelj, S. (2010). Antibacterial action of a novel functionalized chitosan-arginine against Gram-negative bacteria. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.