The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial and cell-adhesive polypeptide and poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel as a potential scaffold for wound healing
Open accessAbstract
The ideal wound healing scaffold should provide the appropriate physical and mechanical properties to prevent secondary infection, as well as an excellent physiological environment to facilitate cell adhesion, proliferation and/or differentiation. Therefore, we developed a synthetic cell-adhesive polypeptide hydrogel with inherent antibacterial activity. A series of polypeptides, poly(Lys)x(Ala)y (x+y=100) with varied hydrophobicity via metal-free ring-opening polymerization of NCA-Lys(Boc) and NCA-Ala monomers (NCA = N-carboxylic anhydride) mediated by hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) were synthesized. These polypeptides were cross-linked with 6-arm PEG-amide succinimidyl glutarate (ASG) (Mw = 10K) to form hydrogels with a gelation time of five minutes and a storage modulus (G') of 1400–3000 Pa as characterized by rheometry. The hydrogel formed by cross-linking of poly(Lys)60(Ala)40 (5 wt%) and 6-arm PEG-ASG (16 wt%) (Gel-III) exhibited cell adhesion and cell proliferation activities superior to other polypeptide hydrogels. In addition, Gel-III displays significant antibacterial activity against E. coli JM109 and S. aureus ATCC25923. Thus, we have developed a novel, cell-adhesive hydrogel with inherent antibacterial activity as a potential scaffold for cutaneous wound healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review
Wilson, C. J., Clegg, R. E., Leavesley, D. I., & Pearcy, M. J. (2005) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.1 · Cited by 1,696
Cited by
Functional Hydrogels as Wound Dressing to Enhance Wound Healing
Liang, Y., He, J., & Guo, B. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c04206 · Cited by 3,135
Yang, Y., Liang, Y., Chen, J., Duan, X., & Guo, B. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.014 · Cited by 548
Evaluation of hydrogels for bio‐printing applications
Murphy, S. V., Skardal, A., & Atala, A. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34326 · Cited by 543
Dong, R., Zhao, X., Guo, B., & Ma, P. X. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b04911 · Cited by 538
Gao, G., Jiang, Y.-W., Jia, H.-R., & Wu, F.-G. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.045 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, A., Rane, A. A., & Christman, K. L.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-50
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125307365
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial and cell-adhesive polypeptide and poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel as a potential scaffold for wound healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.004
- The paper
- Song, A., Rane, A. A., & Christman, K. L. (2012). Antibacterial and cell-adhesive polypeptide and poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel as a potential scaffold for wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.