Sub-lamellar microcracking and roles of canaliculi in human cortical bone
Abstract
Bone is a tough biological material. It is generally accepted that bone's toughness arises from its unique hierarchical structure, which in turn facilitates distributed microcracking prior to fracture. Yet, there has been limited progress on the detailed roles of the structural elements in the microcracking process. The present study examines the structure-microcracking relations at the lamellar and sub-lamellar levels of human cortical bone subjected to compressive loading. Laser scanning confocal microscopy revealed a clear influence of the local structure and porosity of the Haversian systems' lamellae on microcrack development. In particular, crack initiation and growth under transverse compression were associated with stress concentration at canaliculi. Later stages of microcracking showed extensive sub-lamellar cracks forming cross-hatched patterns and regularly spaced 0.5-1.7 μm apart. The density, size and regularity of the crack patterns suggest enhanced inelastic deformation capacity through cracking control at the level of mineralized collagen fibril bundles. The present study thus improves the current understanding of the nature of inelastic deformation and microcracking in bone and further suggests that bone's resistance to fracture is achieved through microcrack control at multiple length scales.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Void structures inside the osteon such as Haversian canals, osteocyte lacunae and canaliculi act as stress concentration sites where MCKs may initiate.
“In the literature, the void structures inside the osteon such as the Haversian canals, osteocyte lacunae and canaliculi are said to act as stress concentration sites where MCKs may initiate [12,13,15,16].”
From Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
MCKs are impacted by trauma circumstances and thus are of forensic relevance.
“MCKs, however, are also impacted by trauma circumstances and thus are of forensic relevance [12,13].”
From Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The principle factor in the bone's resistance to fracture is its toughness, in other words, the bone's ability to resist crack propagation at multiple hierarchical levels.
“The principle factor in the bone’s resistance to fracture is its toughness, in other words, the bone’s ability to resist crack propagation at multiple hierarchical levels [6,12].”
From Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Verborgt, O., Gibson, G. J., & Schaffler, M. B. (2000) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.1.60 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Zioupos, P., Hansen, U., & Currey, J. D. (2008) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.025 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones
Sexton, K., Schwab, N., Galtés, I., Casas, A., Armentano, N., Brillas, P., Garrido, X., & Jordana, X. (2024) · Life · doi:10.3390/life14020220 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ebacher, V., Guy, P., Oxland, T. R., & Wang, R.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1093-1100
- ISSN
- 1742-7061
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
- University of British Columbia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review