Cited by 58Cellular and Composite StructuresAdvanced Materials and MechanicsCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

Structure and mechanical properties of naturally occurring lightweight foam-filled cylinder–The peacock’s tail coverts shaft and its components

Liu, Z.Q., Jiao, D., Meyers, M.A., Zhang, Z.F.·2015·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

Feather shaft, which is primarily featured by a cylinder filled with foam, possesses a unique combination of mechanical robustness and flexibility with a low density through natural evolution and selection. Here the hierarchical structures of peacock's tail coverts shaft and its components are systematically characterized from millimeter to nanometer length scales. The variations in constituent and geometry along the length are examined. The mechanical properties under both dry and wet conditions are investigated. The deformation and failure behaviors and involved strengthening, stiffening and toughening mechanisms are analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively and correlated to the structures. It is revealed that the properties of feather shaft and its components have been optimized through various structural adaptations. Synergetic strengthening and stiffening effects can be achieved in overall rachis owing to increased failure resistance. This study is expected to aid in deeper understandings on the ingenious structure-property design strategies developed by nature, and accordingly, provide useful inspiration for the development of high-performance synthetic foams and foam-filled materials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.035

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z. Q., Jiao, D., Meyers, M. A., & Zhang, Z. F.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Z.Q.
  • Zhang, Z.F.
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
17
Pages
137-151
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965069269
Cited by
58
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51331007)
  • IMR SYNL-T.S. Kê Research Fellowship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Cellular and Composite Structures
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Keywords
feather shaft, hierarchy, lightweight materials, mechanical properties, failure mechanisms, toughening, stiffening, strengthening, biomimetic materials
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Biomechanical Phenomena, Elasticity, Feathers, Male, Materials Testing, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Porosity, Compressive Strength, Galliformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review