The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthetic bone: Design by additive manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
A broad range of synthetic trabecular-like metallic lattices are 3D printed, to study the extra design freedom conferred by this new manufacturing process. The aim is to propose new conceptual types of implant structures for superior bio-mechanical matching and osseo-integration: synthetic bone. The target designs are 3D printed in Ti-6Al-4V alloy using a laser-bed process. Systematic evaluation is then carried out: (i) their accuracy is characterised at high spatial resolution using computed X-ray tomography, to assess manufacturing robustness with respect to the original geometrical design intent and (ii) the mechanical properties - stiffness and strength - are experimentally measured, evaluated, and compared. Finally, this new knowledge is synthesised in a conceptual framework to allow the construction of so-called implant design maps, to define the processing conditions of bone tailored substitutes, with focus on spine fusion devices. The design criteria emphasise the bone stiffness-matching, preferred range of pore structure for bone in-growth, manufacturability of the device and choice of inherent materials properties which are needed for durable implants. Examples of the use of such maps are given with focus on spine fusion devices, emphasising the stiffness-matching, osseo-integration properties and choice of inherent materials properties which are needed for durable implants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: We present a conceptual bio-engineering design methodology for new biomedical lattices produced by additive manufacturing, which addresses some of the critical points in currently existing porous implant materials. Amongst others: (i) feasibility and accuracy of manufacturing, (ii) design to the elastic properties of bone, and (iii) sensible pores sizes for osseointegration. This has inspired new and novel geometrical latticed designs which aim at improving the properties of intervertebral fusion devices. In their fundamental form, these structures are here fabricated and tested. When integrated into medical devices, these concepts could offer superior medical outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · Cited by 6,622
Chen, Q., & Thouas, G. A. (2015) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 · Cited by 2,398
Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys
Niinomi, M. (1998) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00806-x · Cited by 2,157
Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material
Deshpande, V. S., Fleck, N. A., & Ashby, M. F. (2001) · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(01)00010-2 · Cited by 1,741
Recent metallic materials for biomedical applications
Niinomi, M. (2002) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A · doi:10.1007/s11661-002-0109-2 · Cited by 1,508
Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements
Rho, J. Y., Ashman, R. B., & Turner, C. H. (1993) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-d · Cited by 1,283
Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., Bayraktar, H. H., & Keaveny, T. M. (2003) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00071-x · Cited by 1,209
The mechanical properties of cellular solids
Ashby, M. F., & Medalist, R. F. M. (1983) · Metallurgical Transactions A · doi:10.1007/bf02645546 · Cited by 1,137
New Developments of Ti-Based Alloys for Biomedical Applications
Li, Y., Yang, C., Zhao, H., Qu, S., Li, X., & Li, Y. (2014) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma7031709 · Cited by 1,048
Taniguchi, N., Fujibayashi, S., Takemoto, M., Sasaki, K., Otsuki, B., Nakamura, T., Matsushita, T., Kokubo, T., & Matsuda, S. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Properties and applications of additively manufactured metallic cellular materials: A review
du Plessis, A., Razavi, N., Benedetti, M., Murchio, S., Leary, M., Watson, M., Bhate, D., & Berto, F. (2022) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100918 · Cited by 623
Inverse-designed spinodoid metamaterials
Kumar, S., Tan, S., Zheng, L., & Kochmann, D. M. (2020) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-020-0341-6 · Cited by 444
Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Barba, D., Alabort, E., & Reed, R. C.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 637-656
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964473292
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic bone: Design by additive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049
- The paper
- Barba, D., Alabort, E., & Reed, R. C. (2019). Synthetic bone: Design by additive manufacturing. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.