Cited by 17Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAcute Kidney Injury Research

Impact of renal failure on all-cause mortality and other outcomes in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention

Open access
Loncar, Goran, Barthelemy, Olivier, Berman, Emmanuel, Kerneis, Mathieu, Petroni, Thibault, Payot, Laurent, Choussat, Remi, Silvain, Johanne +4 more·2015·Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background Patients with renal failure (RF) have been systematically excluded from clinical trials; consequently their outcomes have not been well studied in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Aims To compare cardiovascular outcomes after contemporary PCI in patients with versus without RF, according to clinical presentation (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], acute coronary syndrome [ACS] or stable coronary artery disease [sCAD]).Methods Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with stent were prospectively included from 2007 to 2012. RF was defined as creatinine clearance<60mL/min. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and target lesion revascularization [TLR]), TLR and Academic Research Consortium definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year.Results Among 5337 patients, 23% had PCI for STEMI, 34% for ACS and 43% for sCAD, while 27% had RF. RF patients had a higher unadjusted death rate than those with preserved renal function (nRF) in all PCI indication groups (STEMI, 41% vs. 7.5%; ACS, 19% vs. 6%; sCAD, 10% vs. 3%; P<0.0001 for all). The rate of MACCE was also higher in RF patients whatever the PCI indication (STEMI, 45% vs. 15%; ACS, 23% vs. 14%; sCAD, 14% vs. 9%; P<0.05 for all). Rates of TLR (5.5-7.4%) and ST (<2.5%) were similar (P>0.05 for both). sCAD-RF and STEMI-nRF patients had similar rates of mortality (P=0.209) and MACCE (P=0.658). RF was independently associated with mortality, with a doubled relative risk in STEMI versus ACS and sCAD groups (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 3.627-7.821 vs. 2.1, 1.465-3.140 and 2.3, 1.507-3.469, respectively; P<0.0001).Conclusion RF is a stronger independent predictor of death after PCI in STEMI than in ACS or sCAD patients. sCAD-RF and STEMI-nRF patients had similar prognoses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.001

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and a small reduction in myocardial infarction were observed in a pooled analysis of the CORONA and GISSI-HF trials.

    “a reduction in HF hospitalizations [218,471], as well as a small reduction in MI, was observed in a pooled analysis of the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA) and GISSI-HF trials [472].”
  • Patients with CKD and established CVD have a much higher mortality rate compared with patients with CVD and normal renal function.

    “Patients with CKD and established CVD have a much higher mortality rate compared with patients with CVD and normal renal function. 392”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [392]

  • Patients with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease are at high or very high cardiovascular risk.

    “Patients with stage 3-5 CKD have to be considered at high or very high CV risk.”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [392]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loncar, G., Barthelemy, O., Berman, E., Kerneis, M., Petroni, T., Payot, L., Choussat, R., Silvain, J., Collet, J.-P., Helft, G., Montalescot, G., & Le Feuvre, C.
Affiliations
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Venue
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
108
Issue
11
Pages
554-562
ISSN
  • 1875-2128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-2136
OpenAlex
W1544272996
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of cardiovascular diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation de France
  • AstraZeneca
  • Biotronik
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Société Française de Cardiologie
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Fédération Française de Cardiologie
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
renal failure, percutaneous coronary intervention, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stable coronary artery disease, target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, renal function, creatinine clearance, stenting, myocardial infarction
MeSH terms
Aged, Cause of Death, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Stents, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Myocardial Ischemia, Risk Assessment, Renal Insufficiency, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review