Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants
Open accessAbstract
Background This article presents evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents. A guideline panel convened by the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated recommendations to address clinical questions in relation to the efficacy, retention, and potential side effects of sealants to prevent dental caries; their efficacy compared with fluoride varnishes; and a head-to-head comparison of the different types of sealant material used to prevent caries on pits-and-fissures of occlusal surfaces. Types of studies reviewed This is an update of the ADA 2008 recommendations on the use of pit-and-fissure sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars. The authors conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other sources to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on the effect of sealants (available on the U.S. market) when applied to the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the quality of the evidence and to move from the evidence to the decisions. Results The guideline panel formulated 3 main recommendations. They concluded that sealants are effective in preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal carious lesions of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents compared with the nonuse of sealants or use of fluoride varnishes. They also concluded that sealants could minimize the progression of non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions (also referred to as initial lesions) that receive a sealant. Finally, based on the available limited evidence, the panel was unable to provide specific recommendations on the relative merits of 1 type of sealant material over the others. Conclusions and practical implications: These recommendations are designed to inform practitioners during the clinical decision-making process in relation to the prevention of occlusal carious lesions in children and adolescents. Clinicians are encouraged to discuss the information in this guideline with patients or the parents of patients. The authors recommend that clinicians re-orient their efforts toward increasing the use of sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The American Dental Association and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention endorse sealant application on all permanent molars in children as a key preventive strategy.
“The American Dental Association (ADA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recognize the substantial advantages of sealant application, endorsing its application on all permanent molars in children as a key preventive strategy [29].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Sealants significantly reduce costs by decreasing the need for restorative treatments.
“Besides preventing caries, sealants significantly reduce costs by decreasing the need for restorative treatments, thereby enhancing overall oral health outcomes [29].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Vist, G. E., Falck-Ytter, Y., Meerpohl, J., & Norris, S. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 · Cited by 8,285 · see citing works
GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Montori, V., Akl, E. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Falck-Ytter, Y. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017 · Cited by 2,798 · see citing works
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Rind, D., Devereaux, P. J., Montori, V. M., Freyschuss, B., Vist, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012 · Cited by 2,693 · see citing works
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Montori, V., Vist, G., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Alonso-Coello, P., Djulbegovic, B., Atkins, D., Falck-Ytter, Y., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011 · Cited by 1,819 · see citing works
Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive
Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G. H., Dellinger, P., Schunemann, H., Levy, M. M., Kunz, R., Norris, S., Bion, J., & for the GRADE working group (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a744 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
The American Dental Association Caries Classification System for Clinical Practice
Young, D. A., Nový, B. B., Zeller, G. G., Hale, R., Hart, T. C., Truelove, E. L., Ekstrand, K. R., Featherstone, J. D. B., Fontana, M., Ismail, A., et al. (2015) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.018 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pitts, N. B., Zero, D. T., Marsh, P. D., Ekstrand, K., Weintraub, J. A., Ramos-Gomez, F., Tagami, J., Twetman, S., Tsakos, G., & Ismail, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.30 · Cited by 1,823 · see citing works
Maguire, A., Clarkson, J. E., Douglas, G. V., Ryan, V., Homer, T., Marshman, Z., McColl, E., Wilson, N., Vale, L., Robertson, M., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24010 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
AL-Kaff, A. A., Alshehri, A. Z., Alasmari, R. A., Alsubaie, N., Aldaws, A., Althaqeel, A., Alshehri, R. S., & Alawaji, Y. M. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.87450 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Besides preventing caries, sealants significantly reduce costs by decreasing the need for restorative treatments, thereby enhancing overall oral health outcomes [29].”
- Authors
- Wright, J. T., Crall, J. J., Fontana, M., Gillette, E. J., Nový, B. B., Dhar, V., Donly, K., Hewlett, E. R., Quinonez, R. B., Chaffin, J., Crespin, M., Iafolla, T., Siegal, M. D., Tampi, M. P., Graham, L., Estrich, C., & Carrasco-Labra, A.
- Corresponding author
- Tampi, Malavika P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of the American Dental Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 672-682.e12
- ISSN
- 0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766458767
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 40.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Ohio State University
- University of Washington
- University of Pittsburgh
- McMaster University
- Nova Southeastern University
- A.T. Still University
- Universidad de Chile
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- University of California, Los Angeles
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- School of Dentistry, University of Michigan
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- School of Dentistry, University of Maryland
- School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
- Keywords
- pit and fissure sealants, dental caries prevention, primary molars, permanent molars, children and adolescents, fluoride varnish, sealant retention, sealants, caries arrest
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Dental Caries, Fluorides, Topical, Humans, Molar, Pit and Fissure Sealants, Evidence-Based Dentistry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review