Cited by 309Dental Health and Care UtilizationDental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments

Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants

Open access
Wright, John T., Crall, James J., Fontana, Margherita, Gillette, E. Jane, Nový, Brian B., Dhar, Vineet, Donly, Kevin, Hewlett, Edmond R. +9 more·2016·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Abstract

Background This article presents evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents. A guideline panel convened by the American Dental Association (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated recommendations to address clinical questions in relation to the efficacy, retention, and potential side effects of sealants to prevent dental caries; their efficacy compared with fluoride varnishes; and a head-to-head comparison of the different types of sealant material used to prevent caries on pits-and-fissures of occlusal surfaces. Types of studies reviewed This is an update of the ADA 2008 recommendations on the use of pit-and-fissure sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars. The authors conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other sources to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on the effect of sealants (available on the U.S. market) when applied to the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the quality of the evidence and to move from the evidence to the decisions. Results The guideline panel formulated 3 main recommendations. They concluded that sealants are effective in preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal carious lesions of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents compared with the nonuse of sealants or use of fluoride varnishes. They also concluded that sealants could minimize the progression of non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions (also referred to as initial lesions) that receive a sealant. Finally, based on the available limited evidence, the panel was unable to provide specific recommendations on the relative merits of 1 type of sealant material over the others. Conclusions and practical implications: These recommendations are designed to inform practitioners during the clinical decision-making process in relation to the prevention of occlusal carious lesions in children and adolescents. Clinicians are encouraged to discuss the information in this guideline with patients or the parents of patients. The authors recommend that clinicians re-orient their efforts toward increasing the use of sealants on the occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent molars in children and adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.06.001

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, J. T., Crall, J. J., Fontana, M., Gillette, E. J., Nový, B. B., Dhar, V., Donly, K., Hewlett, E. R., Quinonez, R. B., Chaffin, J., Crespin, M., Iafolla, T., Siegal, M. D., Tampi, M. P., Graham, L., Estrich, C., & Carrasco-Labra, A.
Corresponding author
Tampi, Malavika P.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
147
Issue
8
Pages
672-682.e12
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766458767
Cited by
309
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 3
FWCI
40.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Washington
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • McMaster University
  • Nova Southeastern University
  • A.T. Still University
  • Universidad de Chile
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • School of Dentistry, University of Michigan
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
  • School of Dentistry, University of Maryland
  • School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Keywords
pit and fissure sealants, dental caries prevention, primary molars, permanent molars, children and adolescents, fluoride varnish, sealant retention, sealants, caries arrest
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Dental Caries, Fluorides, Topical, Humans, Molar, Pit and Fissure Sealants, Evidence-Based Dentistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review