Cited by 237Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental materials and restorations

The American Dental Association Caries Classification System for Clinical Practice

Young, Douglas A., Nový, Brian B., Zeller, Gregory G., Hale, Robert, Hart, Thomas C., Truelove, Edmond L., Ekstrand, Kim R., Featherstone, John D.B. +9 more·2015·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Abstract

Background The caries lesion, the most commonly observed sign of dental caries disease, is the cumulative result of an imbalance in the dynamic demineralization and remineralization process that causes a net mineral loss over time. A classification system to categorize the location, site of origin, extent, and when possible, activity level of caries lesions consistently over time is necessary to determine which clinical treatments and therapeutic interventions are appropriate to control and treat these lesions. Methods In 2008, the American Dental Association (ADA) convened a group of experts to develop an easy-to-implement caries classification system. The ADA Council on Scientific Affairs subsequently compiled information from these discussions to create the ADA Caries Classification System (CCS) presented in this article. Conclusions The ADA CCS offers clinicians the capability to capture the spectrum of caries disease presentations ranging from clinically unaffected (sound) tooth structure to noncavitated initial lesions to extensively cavitated advanced lesions. The ADA CCS supports a broad range of clinical management options necessary to treat both noncavitated and cavitated caries lesions. Practical implications The ADA CCS is available for implementation in clinical practice to evaluate its usability, reliability, and validity. Feedback from clinical practitioners and researchers will allow system improvement. Use of the ADA CCS will offer standardized data that can be used to improve the scientific rationale for the treatment of all stages of caries disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.018

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, D. A., Nový, B. B., Zeller, G. G., Hale, R., Hart, T. C., Truelove, E. L., Ekstrand, K. R., Featherstone, J. D. B., Fontana, M., Ismail, A., Kuehne, J., Longbottom, C., Pitts, N., Sarrett, D. C., Wright, T., Mark, A. M., & Beltran-Aguilar, E.
Affiliations
  • University of the Pacific (US)
  • Loma Linda University (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • United States Army (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Truelove, Edmond L.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
146
Issue
2
Pages
79-86
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006219947
Cited by
237
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-06-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
dental caries, cavitated caries lesions, demineralization and remineralization, caries treatment, clinical standardization
MeSH terms
Dental Caries, Humans, Societies, Dental, Tooth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review