CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 243Dental Health and Care UtilizationDental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesDental materials and restorations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parental perceptions and acceptance of silver diamine fluoride staining

Open access
Crystal, Yasmi O., Janal, Malvin N., Hamilton, Dylan S., Niederman, Richard·2017·The Journal of the American Dental Association
DOI 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.03.013PMC PMC6771934
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background The caries arrest that can be achieved by using silver diamine fluoride (SDF) offers a minimally invasive and inexpensive alternative to traditional restorative caries treatment. The authors evaluated how the dentinal staining that is associated with SDF influences the acceptance of this treatment among parents of young children in the New York City metropolitan area.Methods The authors invited the parents of children who had experienced dental caries and who had appointments at the New York University Pediatric Dentistry Clinic and at several private clinics in New Jersey to participate in a Web-based survey designed to assess parents' demographics, perceptions of photographs of SDF-treated carious teeth, and acceptability of treatment in different behavior management scenarios.Results Ninety-eight mothers and 22 fathers from diverse backgrounds participated. Most parents (67.5%) judged SDF staining on the posterior teeth to be esthetically tolerable, but only 29.7% of parents made this same judgment about anterior teeth (P < .001). In the absence of their child having behavioral barriers to conventional restorations, 53.6% of parents reported that they were likely to choose SDF to treat their child's posterior teeth, but only 26.9% of parents were likely to choose SDF to treat their child's anterior teeth. As the number of children's behavioral barriers increased, so did the parents' level of acceptance. In extreme cases, in which parents had to decide whether their children should undergo general anesthesia during treatment, parents' acceptance rate of SDF as a treatment method increased to 68.5% on posterior teeth and to 60.3% on anterior teeth. Parents' acceptance of the treatment also varied according to their socioeconomic status.Conclusions Staining on posterior teeth was more acceptable than staining on anterior teeth. Although staining on anterior teeth was undesirable, most parents preferred this option to advanced behavioral techniques such as sedation or general anesthesia.Practical implications Clinicians need to understand parental sensitivities regarding the staining effect of SDF to plan adequately for the use of SDF as a method of caries management in pediatric patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.03.013

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 21 references

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 242

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Crystal, Y. O., Janal, M. N., Hamilton, D. S., & Niederman, R.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Crystal, Yasmi O.
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
148
Issue
7
Pages
510-518.e4
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.adaj.2017.03.013
PMC
PMC6771934
OpenAlex
W2609520143
Cited by
243
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 3
FWCI
29.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • York University
  • Rural Development Administration
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001445)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U24 006964, U24MD006964, R01MD011526)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
silver diamine fluoride, parental acceptance, dental caries in children, caries arrest, behavior management, general anesthesia, sedation, socioeconomic status
MeSH terms
Adult, Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Cariostatic Agents, Dental Caries, Female, Fluorides, Topical, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Tooth Discoloration, Tooth, Deciduous, Silver Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review