Cited by 1Dental Health and Care UtilizationDental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments

Is Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) a Viable Biological Treatment Option? Exploring the Application of SDF versus Other Minimally Invasive Methods

Open access
Yörel, Vecihe İpek·2025·Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

Abstract

Untreated dental caries is a worldwide problem. Conventional caries management encompasses removing all the carious tooth tissue and replacing the lost tooth tissue with a restoration. Minimally invasive techniques emerge as alternative treatments to conventional caries management, which include the use of silver diamine fluoride (SDF), atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), interim therapeutic restorations (ITR), fissure sealants, and Hall crowns, together with other caries prevention methods. Modern caries management strategies aim to avoid invasive treatments and attempt to alter the activity of the biofilm and the carious lesions. SDF can be an effective treatment for managing caries at the cavitation stage and may offer an alternative to other minimally invasive methods, especially in preschool children and those with limited access to dental care. This review aims to examine the use of SDF, to evaluate its advantages, disadvantages and discuss whether it can be an alternative or an adjunct to other minimally invasive methods. For this purpose, a literature scan was conducted using the MeSH terms related to the subject (‘silver diamine fluoride’, ‘dental atraumatic restorative treatment’, ‘fluorides, topical’, ‘dental caries’, ‘silver compounds’, ‘cariostatic agents’) in medical databases (Medline-Pubmed, Google Scholar).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7126/cumudj.1626945

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SDF uptake may be limited by permanent black staining of treated lesions, occasional transient mucosal irritation, and esthetic concerns for patients and caregivers.

    “At the same time, its uptake may be limited by recognized disadvantages, including permanent black staining of treated lesions, occasional transient mucosal irritation, and esthetic concerns for patients and caregivers [3].”

    From Silver Diamine Fluoride in Oral Health Policy: A Strategic Pathway to Improve Access and Equity (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discolouration of SDF and Different Formulations section reports black staining that may persist despite polishing and says it concerns patients and parents. The Parental and Patient Perceptions section also describes reduced acceptance when staining is visible. Our copy does not establish that lesion staining is permanent or report occasional transient mucosal irritation; no passage-specific page numbers are supplied. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Broader SDF implementation is constrained by aesthetic concerns.

    “However, broader implementation remains constrained by regulatory ambiguity, limited reimbursement and procurement pathways, workforce training gaps, aesthetic concerns, inconsistent consent and follow‐up processes, and fragmented governance.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [17]17. Crystal YO, Marghalani AA, Ureles SD, Wright JT, Sulyanto R, Divaris K, et al. Use of silver diamine fluoride for dental caries management in children and adolescents, including those with special health care needs. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(5):135-145.
  2. [26]26. Policy on interim therapeutic restorations (ITR). Pediatr Dent 2017;39(6):57-58.
  3. [34]34. Braga MM, Mendes FM, De Benedetto MS, Imparato JCP. Effect of silver diammine fluoride on incipient caries lesions in erupting permanent first molars: a pilot study. J Dent Child 2009;76(1):28- 33.
  4. [36]36. Alhosaini NM, Bahgat S, Elkhadem A. Postoperative pain after treatment with Hall technique versus silver diamine fluoride in the management of carious primary molars: a randomized clinical trial. NeuroQuantology. 2023; 21(6):1677-1694.
  5. [39]39. Duangthip D, Chu CH, Lo ECM. A randomized clinical trial on arresting dentine caries in preschool children by topical fluorides - 18 month results. J Dent 2016;44:57-63.
  6. [47]47. Miller MB, Lopez LA, Quock RL. Silver diamine fluoride, potassium iodide, and esthetic perception: an in vitro pilot study. Am J Dent 2016;29(5):248-250.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yörel, V. İ.
Affiliations
Near East University (CY)
Corresponding author
Yörel, Vecihe İpek
Venue
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Published
2025-12-29
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
608-616
ISSN
1302-5805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7117449933
Cited by
1
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (publishedVersion)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Near East University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Keywords
silver diamine fluoride, dental caries, minimally invasive dentistry, atraumatic restorative treatment, pit and fissure sealants, dental caries prevention, cariostatic agents, biofilm, preschool children, caries management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review