Cited by 147Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

Mental health problems and interest in marijuana treatment among marijuana-using college students

Buckner, Julia D., Ecker, Anthony H., Cohen, Alex S.·2010·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Background There is growing recognition that marijuana use among college students is associated with marijuana-related problems. Yet little work has examined whether use is associated with mental health problems and whether there is a dose effect such that individuals engaging in more frequent use evince relatively greater psychiatric impairments. Further, little is known about factors related to interest in marijuana treatment among students experiencing marijuana-related problems. Method The current study examined academic and psychiatric functioning as well as interest in marijuana treatment among undergraduates (N=1,689). Approximately 29% acknowledged marijuana use, with 9.8% using weekly or more. Results More frequent marijuana use was related to more academic difficulties. Marijuana use (among both weekly and less frequent users) was related to greater psychiatric impairment. Interest in marijuana treatment was examined among students with 2+ marijuana-related problems (n=251). Of those, 22.7% expressed interest in marijuana treatment. Factors positively related to treatment interest included: marijuana use frequency, use-related problems, friends' marijuana use, age, employment status, and some types of mental health problems. Conclusions Marijuana use among college students is associated with academic, psychiatric, and marijuana-related impairments. However, there is some interest in treatment to manage marijuana use among undergraduates, particularly among those with more frequent and more problematic marijuana use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.04.001

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procrastination appears to be associated with cannabis use.

    “Furthermore, procrastination appears to be associated with cannabis use. Buckner et al. (2010) found that over 67% of frequent cannabis users identified as procrastinators, and that over 80% of cannabis users seeking treatment endorse procrastination as a problem.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckner, J. D., Ecker, A. H., & Cohen, A. S.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Buckner, Julia D.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
826-833
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075434510
Cited by
147
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cannabis use, university students, mental illness, academic difficulties, usage frequency, peer influence, psychiatric disability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Louisiana, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Risk Factors, Students, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review