Cited by 26Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Direct and indirect effects of false safety behaviors on cannabis use and related problems

Buckner, Julia D., Zvolensky, Michael J., Businelle, Michael S., Gallagher, Matthew W.·2018·The American Journal on Addictions

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In light of increasing rates of cannabis use and use‐related problems, efforts to understand malleable psychological vulnerability factors related to use and related problems remain important as they can inform prevention and treatment efforts. Recent data indicate that false safety behaviors (FSB; ie, behaviors that may be effective in decreasing anxiety in the short‐term, but can maintain and even exacerbate anxiety in the long‐term) are related to cannabis problem severity. Thus, an important next step is to identify factors implicated in the relation between FSB and cannabis use behavior. The current study tested whether FSB were uniquely related to cannabis use problems and high‐risk cannabis use motives. We also tested whether FSB were indirectly related to cannabis outcomes via high‐risk motives. Method: The sample consisted of 349 current (69.6% female) cannabis‐using undergraduates who completed an online survey. Results: FSB was robustly related to cannabis‐related problems and cannabis use motives (ie, coping and availability) after controlling for anxiety and cannabis use frequency. FSB was indirectly related to cannabis problems via coping and availability motives and to cannabis use frequency via coping motives. Discussion and Conclusions: Results add to a growing literature indicating that FSB are related to cannabis problem severity and extend this work by identifying mechanisms underlying this relationship. Scientific Significance: Data indicate that FSB may be an under recognized, yet clinically important, vulnerability factor related to cannabis use problems. (Am J Addict 2018;27:29–34)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajad.12659

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckner, J. D., Zvolensky, M. J., Businelle, M. S., & Gallagher, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Buckner, Julia D.
Venue
The American Journal on Addictions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-27
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
29-34
ISSN
  • 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0391
OpenAlex
W2776435414
Cited by
26
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R34DA031937)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cannabis use, cannabis-related problems, coping motives, anxiety, usage frequency, vulnerability factors, undergraduate students, indirect effects
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Marijuana Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Risk Factors, Safety, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review