Cited by 153Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealthcare Policy and Management

Prescription drug monitoring programs, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and heroin use: evidence from the national survey of drug use and health

Open access
Ali, Mir M., Dowd, William N., Classen, Timothy, Mutter, Ryan, Novak, Scott P.·2017·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

In the United States, nonmedical prescription opioid use is a major public health concern. Various policy initiatives have been undertaken to tackle this crisis, including state prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs). This study uses the 2004-2014 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) and exploits state-level variation in the timing of PDMP implementation and PDMP characteristics to investigate whether PDMPs are associated with a reduction in prescription opioid misuse or whether they have the unintended consequence of increasing heroin use. In addition, the study examines the impact of PDMPs on the availability of opioids from various sources. The study finds no effect of PDMP status on various measures of nonmedical prescription opioid use (abuse, dependence, and initiation), but finds evidence of a reduction in the number of days of opioid misuse in the past year. The study also finds that implementation of PDMP was not associated with an increase in heroin use or initiation, but was associated with an increase in number of days of heroin use in the past year. Findings also suggest that PDMPs were associated with a significant decline in doctor shopping among individuals without increasing reliance on illegal sources (e.g., drug dealers, stealing, etc.) or social sources (friends or relatives) as a means of obtaining opioids. The President's FY2017 budget proposed the allocation of $1.1 billion in an effort to reduce prescription drug misuse, and highlighted the use of PDMPs as a policy tool. This study documents evidence that PDMPs might be having measurable impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.011

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, M. M., Dowd, W. N., Classen, T., Mutter, R., & Novak, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Ali, Mir M.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
69
Pages
65-77
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570063599
Cited by
153
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2013: 1
FWCI
22.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) (public-domain)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
prescription drug monitoring programs, prescription opioid misuse, heroin use, doctor shopping, opioid availability, drug policy evaluation, opioid use disorder, opioid initiation
MeSH terms
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Young Adult, Prescription Drug Misuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review