Cited by 2Treatment of Major DepressionSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Corrigendum to “The war on antidepressants: What we can, and can't conclude, from the systematic review of antidepressant withdrawal effects by Davies and Read” [Addictive Behaviors (2019)]

Open access
Jauhar, Sameer, Hayes, Joseph·2019·Addictive Behaviors

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jauhar, S., & Hayes, J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jauhar, Sameer
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
97
Pages
126
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947258614
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (211085, 211085/Z/18/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
antidepressant discontinuation, antidepressants, systematic review critique, antidepressant safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review