The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of compressive and flexural properties of continuous fiber fabrication additive manufacturing technology
Abstract
Abstract This study focuses on the characterization of additive manufacturing technology based on composite filament fabrication (CFF). CFF utilizes a similar method of layer by layer printing as fused filament fabrication but is also capable of reinforcing parts with layers of various continuous fibers into a polymer matrix. Due to the orthotropic characteristics of additive manufacturing based on fused filament fabrication, 3D printed parts may present different mechanical behavior under different orientations of stress. Furthermore, technologies such as CFF allow a range of configurations to fabricate and reinforce the parts. In this study, mechanical characterization of polyamide 6 (PA6) reinforced with carbon fiber was conducted by design of experiment as a statistical method, to investigate the effect of reinforcement pattern, reinforcement distribution, print orientation and percentage of fiber on compressive and flexural mechanical properties. CFF technology 3D print stronger parts than conventional additive manufacturing technologies. Maximized compressive response was achieved with a 0.2444 Carbon Fiber volume ratio, concentric and equidistant reinforcement configuration, resulting in a compressive modulus of 2.102 GPa and a stress at proportional limit of 53.3 MPa. Maximized flexural response was achieved with 0.4893 Carbon Fiber volume ratio, concentric reinforcement and perpendicular to the applied force, resulting in a flexural modulus of 14.17 GPa and a proportional limit of 231.1 MPa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Kabir, S. M. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A.-F. M. (2020) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 · Cited by 678
Recent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Agarwala, S., & Yeong, W. Y. (2019) · Advanced Materials Technologies · doi:10.1002/admt.201800271 · Cited by 621
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Araya-Calvo, M., López-Gómez, I., Chamberlain-Simon, N., León-Salazar, J. L., Guillén-Girón, T., Corrales-Cordero, J. S., & Sánchez-Brenes, O.
- Venue
- Additive Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 157-164
- ISSN
- 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-8604
- OpenAlex
- W2804147115
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of compressive and flexural properties of continuous fiber fabrication additive manufacturing technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.007
- The paper
- Araya-Calvo, M., López-Gómez, I., Chamberlain-Simon, N., León-Salazar, J. L., Guillén-Girón, T., Corrales-Cordero, J. S., & Sánchez-Brenes, O. (2018). Evaluation of compressive and flexural properties of continuous fiber fabrication additive manufacturing technology. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.