Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 820

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing

Open access
Cunningham, C.R., Flynn, J.M., Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V., Newman, S.T.·2018·Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Abstract Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) is attracting significant attention in industry and academia due to its ability to capture the benefits of additive manufacturing for production of large components of medium geometric complexity. Uniquely, WAAM combines the use of wire and electric arc as a fusion source to build components in a layer-by-layer approach, both of which can offer significant cost savings compared to powder and alternative fusion sources, such as laser and electron beam, respectively. Meanwhile, a high deposition rate, key for producing such components, is provided, whilst also allowing significant material savings compared to conventional manufacturing processes. However, high quality production in a wide range of materials is limited by the elevated levels of heat input which causes a number of materials processing challenges in WAAM. The materials processing challenges are fully identified in this paper to include the development of high residual stresses, undesirable microstructures, and solute segregation and phase transformations at solidification. The thermal profile during the build poses another challenge leading to heterogeneous and anisotropic material properties. This paper outlines how the materials processing challenges may be addressed in WAAM by implementation of quality improving ancillary processes. The primary WAAM process selections and ancillary processes are classified by the authors and a comprehensive review of their application conducted. Strategies by which the ancillary processes can enhance the quality of WAAM parts are presented. The efficacy and suitability of these strategies for versatile and cost effective WAAM production are discussed and a future vision of WAAM process developments provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 820

Metadata

Authors
Cunningham, C. R., Flynn, J. M., Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V., & Newman, S. T.
Venue
Additive Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
22
Pages
672-686
ISSN
  • 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-8604
OpenAlex
W2810885441
Cited by
820
References
44
FWCI
35.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020
The paper
Cunningham, C. R., Flynn, J. M., Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V., & Newman, S. T. (2018). Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.