Material extrusion 3D printing of polyether ether ketone in vacuum environment: Heat dissipation mechanism and performance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar or slightly better tensile properties can be expected when printing PEEK in a vacuum compared to results obtained with a 150°C ambient air temperature.
“Liu et al. [197] showed that similar or slightly better tensile properties can be expected when printing PEEK in a vacuum, compared to the results obtained with a 150 ◦ C ambient air temperature by Yang et al. [201].”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [197]
The rise in crystallinity shifted fracture behavior from ductile failure to brittle failure.
“This rise in crystallinity resulted in a shift in fracture behavior, transitioning from ductile failure to brittle failure, as anticipated.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [197]
Printing PEEK is challenging due to its semicrystalline nature, high melting point, and high melt viscosity.
“However, printing PEEK can be challenging due to its semicrystalline nature, high melting point, and high melt viscosity.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [197]
PEEK parts printed in the vacuum environment achieved a relative density of 99.37%.
“The parts printed in the vacuum environment achieved a relative density of 99.37%.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [197]
PEEK samples printed in a 100 MPa vacuum environment showed an improvement in crystallinity from 14.9% to 27.8%, an 86.6% increase.
“They observed an improvement in the crystallinity of the samples, increasing from 14.9% to 27.8%, representing an 86.6% increase.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [197]
Cites
Yang, C., Tian, X., Li, D., Cao, Y., Zhao, F., & Shi, C. (2017) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Self-citationFused filament fabrication of peek: A review of process-structure-property relationships
Zanjanijam, A. R., Major, I., Lyons, J. G., Lafont, U., & Devine, D. M. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12081665 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction
Azami, M., Kazemi, Z., Moazen, S., Dubé, M., Potvin, M.-J., & Skonieczny, K. (2024) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101045 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, T., Zhang, M., Kang, Y., Tian, X., Ding, J., & Li, D.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
- China Academy of Space Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tian, Xiaoyong
- Venue
- Additive Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 103390
- ISSN
- 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-8604
- OpenAlex
- W4313594863
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Additive manufacturing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (52075422, 52205413)
- K. C. Wong Education Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Keywords
- PEEK, material extrusion, heat dissipation, crystallinity, interlayer bonding, tensile strength, void reduction, warpage, infrared thermography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
