Cited by 65

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transgenic animal models of neurodegenerative diseases and their application to treatment development

ROCKENSTEIN, E, CREWS, L, MASLIAH, E·2007·Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Abstract

Neurodegenerative disorders of the aging population affect over 5 million people in the US and Europe alone. The common feature is the progressive accumulation of misfolded proteins with the formation of toxic oligomers. Previous studies show that while in Alzheimer's disease (AD) misfolded amyloid-beta protein accumulates both in the intracellular and extracellular space, in Lewy body disease (LBD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), Fronto-Temporal dementia (FTD), prion diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and trinucleotide repeat disorders (TNRD), the aggregated proteins accumulate in the plasma membrane and intracellularly. Protein misfolding and accumulation is the result of an altered balance between protein synthesis, aggregation rate and clearance. Based on these studies, considerable advances have been made in the past years in developing novel experimental models of neurodegenerative disorders. This has been in part driven by the identification of genetic mutations associated with familial forms of these conditions and gene polymorphisms associated with the more common sporadic variants of these diseases. Transgenic and knock out rodents and Drosophila as well as viral vector driven models of Alzheimer's disease (AD), PD, Huntington's disease (HD) and others have been developed, however the focus for this review will be on rodent models of AD, FTD, PD/LBD, and MSA. Promising therapeutic results have been obtained utilizing amyloid prec…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.013

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Defective spatial learning and memory are also observed in 8-month or older Tg2576 mice that express APPswe.

    “They are also observed in 8-mo or older Tg2576 mice that express APPswe (Hsiao et al., 1996; Chapman et al., 1999; Rockenstein et al., 2007).”

    From VPS35 haploinsufficiency increases Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology (2011) · cites this paper as Rockenstein et al., 2007

  • Tg2576 mice express the Swedish mutant form of human APP (APPswe) under the control of prion promoter.

    “we crossed Tg2576 mice, a well-established AD mouse model that expresses the Swedish mutant form of human APP (APPswe) under the control of prion promoter (Chapman et al., 1999; Rockenstein et al., 2007)”

    From VPS35 haploinsufficiency increases Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology (2011) · cites this paper as Rockenstein et al., 2007

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
ROCKENSTEIN, E., CREWS, L., & MASLIAH, E.
Venue
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09-30
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
1093-1102
ISSN
0169-409X
Cited by
65
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review