Liposome imaging agents in personalized medicine
Abstract
In recent years the importance of molecular and diagnostic imaging has increased dramatically in the treatment planning of many diseases and in particular in cancer therapy. Within nanomedicine there are particularly interesting possibilities for combining imaging and therapy. Engineered liposomes that selectively localize in tumor tissue can transport both drugs and imaging agents, which allows for a theranostic approach with great potential in personalized medicine. Radiolabeling of liposomes have for many years been used in preclinical studies for evaluating liposome in vivo performance and has been an important tool in the development of liposomal drugs. However, advanced imaging systems now provide new possibilities for non-invasive monitoring of liposome biodistribution in humans. Thus, advances in imaging and developments in liposome radiolabeling techniques allow us to enter a new arena where we start to consider how to use imaging for patient selection and treatment monitoring in connection to nanocarrier based medicines. Nanocarrier imaging agents could furthermore have interesting properties for disease diagnostics and staging. Here, we review the major advances in the development of radiolabeled liposomes for imaging as a tool in personalized medicine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Radiolabeled liposomes can be used to both identify the tumor and treat it while also determining the bio-distribution of liposomes in the body.
“Radiolabeled liposomes can be used to both identify the tumor and treat it while also determining the bio-distribution of liposomes in the body.52”
From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 202 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Petersen, A. L., Hansen, A. E., Gabizon, A., & Andresen, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Denmark (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Andresen, Thomas L.
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1417-1435
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978069569
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 202
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Lundbeckfonden (R105-2011-9829)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Keywords
- radiolabeled liposomes, theranostics, personalized medicine, nanomedicine, molecular imaging, cancer diagnosis, liposome biodistribution, patient selection, treatment monitoring, nanocarriers, disease staging
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Liposomes, Neoplasms, Radiopharmaceuticals, Precision Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review