The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients
Open accessAbstract
The delivery of personalized antimicrobial therapy is a critical component in the treatment of patients with invasive infections. Vancomycin, the drug of choice for infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, requires the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for delivery of optimal therapy. Current guidance on vancomycin TDM includes the measurement of a trough concentration as a surrogate for achieving an AUC to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by broth microdilution (AUC/MICBMD) ratio≥400. Although trough-only monitoring has been widely integrated into clinical practice, there is a high degree of inter-individual variability between a measured trough concentration and the actual AUC value. The therapeutic discordance between AUC and trough may lead to suboptimal outcomes among patients with infections due to less susceptible pathogens or unnecessarily increase the probability of acute kidney injury (AKI) in others. Given the potentially narrow vancomycin AUC range for optimal effect and minimal AKI, clinicians need a "real-time" system to predict accurately the AUC with limited pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling. This article reviews two innovative approaches for calculating the vancomycin AUC in clinical practice based on one or two drug concentrations. One such approach involves the use of Bayesian computer software programs to estimate the "true" vancomycin AUC value with minimal PK sampling and provide AUC-guided dosing recommendations at the bedside. An alternative involves use of two concentrations (peak and trough) and simple analytic equations to estimate AUC values. Both approaches provide considerable improvements over the current trough-only concentration monitoring method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rybak, M., Lomaestro, B., Rotschafer, J. C., Moellering, R., Craig, W., Billeter, M., Dalovisio, J. R., & Levine, D. P. (2009) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp080434 · Cited by 1,795
Kullar, R., Davis, S. L., Levine, D. P., & Rybak, M. J. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir124 · Cited by 463 · cited 1×
“However, at the upper end of the trough continuum, treatment failure again increased in patients with vancomycin trough concentrations N20 mg/L [20].”
Background
Cited by
Neely, M. N., Kato, L., Youn, G., Kraler, L., Bayard, D., van Guilder, M., Schumitzky, A., Yamada, W., Jones, B., & Minejima, E. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.02042-17 · Cited by 359
Self-citationThabit, A. K., Crandon, J. L., & Nicolau, D. P. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.993381 · Cited by 160
Turner, R. B., Kojiro, K., Shephard, E. A., Won, R., Chang, E., Chan, D., & Elbarbry, F. (2018) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2191 · Cited by 135
Beavers, D. P., Hsieh, K. L., Kitzman, D. W., Kritchevsky, S. B., Messier, S. P., Neiberg, R. H., Nicklas, B. J., Rejeski, W. J., & Beavers, K. M. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267779 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Pai, M. P., Neely, M., Rodvold, K. A., & Lodise, T. P.
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 50-57
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057605178
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addr.2014.05.016
- The paper
- Pai, M. P., Neely, M., Rodvold, K. A., & Lodise, T. P. (2014). Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.05.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.