Cited by 59Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)

Efficient and privacy preserving supplier matching for electric vehicle charging

Yucel, Fatih, Akkaya, Kemal, Bulut, Eyuphan·2019·Ad Hoc Networks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.07.029

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yucel, F., Akkaya, K., & Bulut, E.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Bulut, Eyuphan
Venue
Ad Hoc Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
90
Pages
101730
ISSN
1570-8705 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883519586
Cited by
59
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ad Hoc Networks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, partially homomorphic encryption, distributed matching, charging station scheduling, location privacy, DSRC, stable matching, dynamic matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review