Cited by 27Identity, Memory, and TherapyCareer Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The role of best friends in educational identity formation in adolescence

Open access
van Doeselaar, Lotte, Meeus, Wim, Koot, Hans M., Branje, Susan·2016·Journal of Adolescence

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This 4‐year longitudinal study examined over‐time associations between adolescents' educational identity, perceived best friends' balanced relatedness, and best friends' educational identity. Adolescents ( N = 464, M age = 14.0 years at baseline, 56.0% males, living in the Netherlands) and their self‐nominated best friends reported on their educational commitment, in‐depth exploration, and reconsideration. Target adolescents also reported on the level of balanced relatedness provided by their best friend. Cross‐lagged panel models showed that balanced relatedness significantly predicted adolescents' reconsideration, and was predicted by in‐depth exploration and, in an inconsistent pattern, by commitment. Best friends' educational identity did not positively predict adolescents' educational identity. Perceiving a best friend as high on balanced relatedness seems to reduce adolescents' problematic educational reconsideration, while, in turn, adaptive educational identity processes might foster balanced relatedness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.12.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher autonomy support from friends reduces adolescents' problematic educational reconsideration.

    “higher autonomy support from friends reduces adolescents' problematic educational reconsideration [47]”

    From Adolescent identity development in context. (2022) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Cross-Lagged Panel Models section reports that adolescents who perceived greater balanced relatedness from their best friends showed a small relative decrease in educational reconsideration over time. The paper describes this as something that “seems to reduce” reconsideration; the claim’s unqualified “reduces” overstates that hedged, observational finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adaptive educational identity processes foster autonomy supportive interactions.

    “Adaptive educational identity processes foster autonomy supportive interactions [47]”

    From Adolescent identity development in context. (2022) · cites this paper as [47]

    In “Friends’ Balanced Relatedness” (page not specified), the paper reports that educational in-depth exploration and commitment were associated with later increases in adolescents’ perceived balanced relatedness with their best friends. Balanced relatedness includes acceptance of a friend’s autonomy, but the study reports perceptions and associations, not that identity processes causally foster autonomy-supportive interactions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Akers, J. F., Jones, R. M., & Coyl, D. D. (1998). Adolescent friendship pairs: Similarities in identity status development, behaviors, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 178-201. doi:10.1177/0743554898132005 · DOI
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480. doi:10.1037//0003- 066X.55.5.469 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Muraven, M. (1996). Identity as adaptation to social, cultural, and historical context. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 405-416. doi:10.1006/jado.1996.0039 · DOI
  4. Bauminger, N., Finzi-Dottan, R., Chason, S., & Har-Even, D. (2008). Intimacy in adolescent friendships: The roles of attachment, coherence, and self-discloure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 409-428. doi:10.1177/0265407508090866 · DOI
  5. Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
  6. Branje, S., Frijns, T., Finkenauer, C., Engels, R., & Meeus, W. (2007). You are my best friend: Commitment and stability in adolescents' same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 14, 587-603. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00173.x · DOI
  7. Branje, S., Laninga-Wijnen, L., Yu, R., & Meeus, W. (2014). Associations among school and friendship identity in adolescence and romantic relationships and work in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2, 6-16. doi:10.1177/2167696813515851 · DOI
  8. Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166-179. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x · DOI
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  10. Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., Luyckx, K., & Meeus, W. (2008). Identity formation in early and middle adolescents from various ethnic groups: From three dimensions to five statuses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 983-996. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9222-2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., & Meeus, W. (2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three- dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 207-222. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002 · DOI
  12. Doumen, S., Smits, I., Luyckx, K., Duriez, B., Vanhalst, J., Verschueren, K., & Goossens, L. (2012). Identity and perceived peer relationship quality in emerging adulthood: The mediating role of attachment-related emotions. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1417-1425. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.01.003 · DOI
  13. Dumas, T. M. (2011). An observational assessment of peer group contributions to adolescent identity development (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University of Western Ontario -Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. (Paper 168)
  14. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
  15. Johnson, H. D. (2012). Relationship duration moderation of identity status differences in emerging adults' same-sex friendship intimacy. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1515-1525. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.07.001 · DOI
  16. Kalakoski, V., & Nurmi, J. (1998). Identity and educational transitions: Age differences in adolescent exploration and commitment related to education, occupation, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 29-47. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0801_2 · DOI
  17. Kerpelman, J. L., Pittman, J. F., & Lamke, L. K. (1997). Toward a microprocess perspective on adolescent identity development: An identity control theory approach. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 325-346. doi:10.1177/0743554897123002 · DOI
  18. Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198-1202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Luyckx, K., Soenens, B., Goossens, L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2007). Parenting, identity formation, and college adjustment: A mediation model with longitudinal data. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 7, 309-330. doi:10.1080/15283480701600785 · DOI
  20. McLean, K. C., & Jennings, L. E. (2012). Teens telling tales: How maternal and peer audiences support narrative identity development. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1455-1469. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.12.005 · DOI
  21. Mclean, K. C., & Pasupathi, M. (2010). Narrative development in adolescence: Creating the storied self. New York, NY: Springer.
  22. Meeus, W., Iedema, J., Helsen, M., & Vollebergh, W. (1999). Patterns of adolescent identity development: Review of literature and longitudinal analysis. Developmental Review, 19, 419-461. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0483 · DOI
  23. Meeus, W., Van de Schoot, R., Keijsers, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Branje, S. (2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation. A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development, 81, 1565-1581. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  25. Reis, O., & Youniss, J. (2004). Patterns in identity change and development in relationships with mothers and friends. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 31- 44. doi:10.1177/0743558403258115 · DOI
  26. Ryan, A. M. (2010). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents' motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101-111. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3502_4 · DOI
  27. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Selfhout, M. H. W., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2009). Developmental trajectories of perceived friendship intimacy, constructive problem solving, and depression from early to late adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 251-264. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9273-1 · DOI
  29. Shulman, S., & Knafo, D. (1997). Balancing closeness and individuality in adolescent close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 687- 702. doi:10.1080/016502597384622 · DOI
  30. Shulman, S., Laursen, B., Kalman, Z., & Karpovsky, S. (1997). Adolescent intimacy revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 597-617. doi:10.1023/A:1024586006966 · DOI
  31. Thorne, A., & Shapiro, L. A. (2011). Testing, testing: Everyday storytelling and the construction of adolescent identity. In E. Amsel & J. Smetana (Eds.), Adolescent vulnerabilities and opportunities (pp. 117-138). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Weeks, T. L., & Pasupathi, M. (2010). Autonomy, identity, and narrative construction with parents and friends. In K. C. Mclean & M. Pasupathi (Eds.), Narrative development in adolescence: Creating the storied self (pp. 65-91). New York, NY: Springer. 18.11 4.13 17.83 4.38 18.00 4.41 18.41 4.51 18.34 4.41 .41*** .47*** .45*** .53*** Best friend 17.74 3.95 18.09 3.98 18.03 3.78 18.37 4.18 18.20 4.09 .43*** .39*** .40*** .45*** In-depth exploration Adolescent 15.77 3.90 16.15 3.92 15.74 4.25 16.13 4.14 16.25 3.92 .37*** .37*** .41*** .52*** Best friend 15.26 3.86 15.99 3.76 15.12 3.80 15.41 3.79 15.87 3.70 .33*** .36*** .42*** .32*** Reconsideration Adolescent .95 2.91 5.82 2.62 5.91 2.89 5.89 3.10 6.16 3.10 .34*** .43*** .27*** .38*** Best friend 5.69 2.83 5.80 2.83 5.84 2.91 5.75 3.04 5.99 3.03 .33*** .28*** .34*** .33*** Balanced relatedness Adolescent 22.34 2.95 22.34 2.95 22.16 2.96 22.16 3.25 21.90 3.37 .37*** .46*** .32

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Doeselaar, L., Meeus, W., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S.
Affiliations
  • Research Centre Adolescent Development Utrecht University P.O. Box 80140 3508 TC Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-24
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
28-37
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2199811110
Cited by
27
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • Tilburg University Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (GB‐MAGW 480‐03‐005, GB‐MAGW 480‐08‐006)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Universiteit Utrecht
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (GB-MAGW 480-03-005, GB-MAGW 480-08-006)
  • Stichting Achmea Slachtoffer en Samenleving (SASS)
  • VU University Amsterdam
  • Utrecht University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
educational identity, best friends, peer relationships, educational commitment, adolescents, educational aspirations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review