The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Runoff conditions in the upper Danube basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios
Kling, H., Fuchs, M., & Paulin, M. (2012) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.011 · Cited by 1,676
Characterising performance of environmental models
Bennett, N. D., Croke, B. F. W., Guariso, G., Guillaume, J. H. A., Hamilton, S. H., Jakeman, A. J., Marsili-Libelli, S., Newham, L. T. H., Norton, J. P., Perrin, C., et al. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011 · Cited by 1,536
Good practice in Bayesian network modelling
Chen, S. H., & Pollino, C. A. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.012 · Cited by 657
Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models
van Vliet, J., Bregt, A. K., & Hagen-Zanker, A. (2011) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.017 · Cited by 317
Augusiak, J., Van den Brink, P. J., & Grimm, V. (2014) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.009 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Refsgaard, J. C., & Henriksen, H. J.
- Venue
- Advances in Water Resources
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-82
- ISSN
- 0309-1708 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973807249
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006
- The paper
- Refsgaard, J. C., & Henriksen, H. J. (2004). Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
