The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density
Holling, C. S. (1966) · Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada · doi:10.4039/entm9848fv · Cited by 1,349
Van Der Sluijs, J. P., Craye, M., Funtowicz, S., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J., & Risbey, J. (2005) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x · Cited by 426
Cited by
ODD+2D: An ODD Based Protocol for Mapping Data to Empirical ABMs
Laatabi, A., Marilleau, N., Nguyen-Huu, T., Hbid, H., & Ait Babram, M. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.3646 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Augusiak, J., Van den Brink, P. J., & Grimm, V.
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 280
- Pages
- 117-128
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986687031
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.009
- The paper
- Augusiak, J., Van den Brink, P. J., & Grimm, V. (2014). Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
