Cited by 1,065Infrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionCivil and Structural Engineering Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on computer vision based defect detection and condition assessment of concrete and asphalt civil infrastructure

Open access
Koch, Christian, Georgieva, Kristina, Kasireddy, Varun, Akinci, Burcu, Fieguth, Paul·2015·Advanced Engineering Informatics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.008

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 107 references

1 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. T. Iseley, D.M. Abraham S. Gokhale, Intelligent sewer condition evaluation technologies, in: Proceedings of the International NO-DIG Conference, 1997, pp. 254–265.
  2. P. Kohut, K. Holak, T. Uhl, Monitoring of civil engineering structures supported by vision system, in: European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 2012, pp. 1575–1582.
  3. Miyamoto, 2007, Automatic crack recognition system for concrete structures using image processing approach, Asian J. Inf. Technol., 6, 553
  4. S.C. Radopoulou, I. Brilakis, Improving patch distress detection using vision tracking on video data, in: Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Intelligent Computing in Engineering, 2014.
  5. G. Moussa, K. Hussain, A new technique for automatic detection and parameters estimation of pavement crack, in: 4th International Multi-Conference on Engineering Technology Innovation, IMETI 2011, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Koch, C., Georgieva, K., Kasireddy, V., Akinci, B., & Fieguth, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Koch, Christian
Venue
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
196-210
ISSN
1474-0346 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128880484
Cited by
1,065
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 126 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 3
FWCI
67.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2016-04-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Engineering Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering Research
Keywords
computer vision, defect detection, condition assessment, concrete infrastructure, asphalt pavement, reinforced concrete bridges, visual inspection, infrastructure safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review