The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of electricity cost of wind energy using Monte Carlo simulations based on nonparametric and parametric probability density functions
Open accessAbstract
It is conventional in wind energy assessment projects to calculate the expected value of the annual energy production (AEP). However, ignoring the effect of wind speed distribution on the distribution of the annual energy production may cause wrong predictions in the cost analysis. For a better estimation of the payback period, it is essential to accurately determine the confidence levels of the electricity cost around the expected value. Wind speed distributions are commonly represented by the Weibull model. Improved functions or nonparametric functions are preferred in the case of multimodal wind speed distributions. As nonparametric probability density function, the optimum spline based functions are implemented and compared to Weibull, Weibull & Weibull for two different wind sites. The results show that the spline based probability density functions produce minimum fitting error for the analyzed cases. Once the wind speed distributions are characterized, random wind speeds are generated to calculate the AEP distributions by Monte Carlo simulations. The cost analysis is then carried out based on the AEP distributions which includes the determination of the confidence levels. It is observed that the confidence levels of the electricity costs which are not falling close to the expected cost region are much greater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MCS can be invaluable to risk managers and helpful for estimating project durations and costs.
“This technique can be invaluable to risk managers and helpful for estimating project durations and costs (Ali Elfarra and Kaya, 2021).”
From Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: A quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation (2024) · cites this paper as Ali Elfarra and Kaya, 2021
The Introduction (page unavailable) says Monte Carlo simulations help estimate confidence levels for electricity costs in wind-energy projects, supporting the cost-estimation part of the claim. It also discusses minimizing investment risk, but does not address risk managers or estimating project durations. The pay-off period in §4.4 is not a project-duration estimate. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Dabbaghiyan, 2016, Evaluation of wind energy potential in province of Bushehr, Iran, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 55, 455, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.148 · DOI
- Jiang, 2015, Comprehensive assessment of wind resources and the low-carbon economy: an empirical study in the Alxa and Xilin Gol Leagues of inner Mongolia, China, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 50, 1304, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.082 · DOI
- S. Vittal, M. Teboul, Performance and Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines Using Monte Carlo Methods Based on System Transport Theory, 46th AIAA / ASME / ASCE / AHS / ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 18-21 April 2005, Texas, USA. DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-2218. · DOI
- M.D. Usman, M. Shaaban, Value at Risk Estimation of a Power System Including Wind Generation, 2013 IEEE Student Conference on Research and development (SCOReD), 16 -17 December 2013, Putrajaya, Malaysia. DOI: 10.1109/SCOReD.2013.7002649 · DOI
- Dumitrascu, 2015, Reliability estimation of parameters of helical wind turbine with vertical axis, The Sci. World J., 2015, 10.1155/2015/296762 · DOI
- Loukatou, 2018, Stochastic wind speed modelling for estimation of expected wind power output, Appl. Energy, 228, 1328, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.117 · DOI
- Arslan, 2014, Comparative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 40, 820, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.009 · DOI
- Weibull, 1951, A statistical distribution function of wide applicability, J. Appl. Mech., 103, 293, 10.1115/1.4010337 · DOI
- Akdağ, 2010, Use of two-component Weibull mixtures in the analysis of wind speed in the Eastern Mediterranean, App. Energ., 87, 2566, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.02.033 · DOI
- Jaramillo, 2004, Wind speed analysis in La Ventosa, Mexico: a bimodal probability distribution case, Renew. Energ., 29, 1613, 10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.001 · DOI
- Amaya-Martinez, 2014, A statistical analysis of wind speed distribution models in the Aburrá Valley, Colombia, CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro., 5, 121, 10.29047/01225383.36 · DOI
- Draxl, 2015, The wind integration national dataset (WIND) toolkit, Appl. Energ., 151, 355, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.121 · DOI
- Yürüşen, 2016, Probability density function selection based on the characteristics of wind speed data, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 753
- Silverman, 1981, Using kernel density estimates to investigate multimodality, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological), 43, 97, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1981.tb01155.x · DOI
- Pararai, 2015, A new class of generalized power lindley distribution with applications to lifetime data, Theor. Math. Appl., 5, 53
- Docenko, 2003, Spline histogram method for reconstruction of probability density functions of clusters of galaxies, Galaxy J., 626, 294
- Munkhammar, 2017, Polynomial probability distribution estimation using the method of moments, PLoS ONE, 12 No 4
- Morrissey, 2012, Tractable analytic expressions for the wind speed probability density functions using expansions of orthogonal polynomials, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 1310, 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0236.1 · DOI
- Wang, 2019, Frequency distribution model of wind speed based on the exponential polynomial for wind farms, Sustainability., 11 No.3
- M. Elfarra, M. Kaya, Comparison of Optimum Spline Based Probability Density Functions to Parametric Distributions for the Wind Speed Data in terms of Annual Energy Production, Energies. 11 No. 11 (20189. DOI: 10.3390/en11113190. · DOI
- Izenman, 1991, Recent developments in nonparametric density estimation, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 86, 205
- J.F. Manwell, J.G. McGowan, A.L. Rogers, Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, pp. 38-57, 2002. · DOI
- Jaramillo, 2004, Wind speed analysis in La Ventosa, Mexico: a bimodal probability distribution case, Renew. Energ., 29, 1613, 10.1016/j.renene.2004.02.001 · DOI
- Elfarra, 2018, Technical and economical evaluation and GHG analysis of wind power generation in four sites using different weibull parameters, Int. J. Renewable Energy Res., 8, 1697
- Satyanarayana, 2016, Wind energy potential and cost estimation of wind energy conversion systems (WECSs) for electricity generation in the eight selected locations of Tigray region (Ethiopia), Renewables: Wind, Water and Solar., 3 No.10
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acebes, F., González-Varona, J. M., López-Paredes, A., & Pajares, J. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03180-5 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Ali Elfarra, M., & Kaya, M.
- Affiliations
- Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR)
- ORCID
- Kaya, Mustafa
- Venue
- Alexandria Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3631-3640
- ISSN
- 1110-0168 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3134673939
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Alexandria Engineering Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- AYBU AVESIS (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Wind Energy Research and Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Energy Load and Power Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
- Keywords
- annual energy production, wind speed distribution, Weibull distribution, Monte Carlo simulation, confidence level, payback period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review