Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity of annual rice–wheat rotations with integrated soil–crop system management

Open access
Ma, Y.C., Kong, X.W., Yang, B., Zhang, X.L., Yan, X.Y., Yang, J.C., Xiong, Z.Q.·2013·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

The impact of management practices on the net global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) of rice cropping systems is not well documented. A field experiment was established in 2009 to gain insight into the net ecosystem carbon budget and the net GWP and GHGI on the crop seasonal scale over two cycles of rice–wheat rotations. With the local farmer's practices (FP) as the control, three integrated soil–crop system management (ISSM) practices at different nitrogen (N) application rates were established – ISSM-N1, ISSM-N2 and ISSM-N3 – for improvement of rice yield and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Compared with the FP, the rice yields significantly increased by 8.2%, 18% and 31%, while the agronomic NUE increased by 68%, 74% and 99% for ISSM-N1, ISSM-N2 and ISSM-N3, respectively. Within the three ISSM practices averaged over the two cycles, the soil organic carbon sequestration potentials, CH4 and N2O emissions were estimated to be 0.089–0.67 t C ha−1 yr−1, 166–288 kg CH4C ha−1 yr−1 and 4.27–5.47 kg N2ON ha−1 yr−1, respectively. Compared to the net GWPs (8.36 t CO2eq ha−1 yr−1) and GHGI (0.58 kg CO2eq kg−1 grain) from the FP, the ISSM-N1 and ISSM-N2 reduced both the net GWPs and GHGIs to some extent, indicating that GHG mitigation can be simultaneously achieved with improved food production and NUE. Although it produced similar GHGIs, the ISSM-N3 increased the net GWPs by 16% compared to the FP, indicating that more research is required on ISSMs for mitigating GHGs to further increase the grain yield and NUE in rice agriculture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2012.11.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Ma, Y. C., Kong, X. W., Yang, B., Zhang, X. L., Yan, X. Y., Yang, J. C., & Xiong, Z. Q.
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
164
Pages
209-219
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063046744
Cited by
258
References
5
FWCI
14.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity of annual rice–wheat rotations with integrated soil–crop system management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agee.2012.11.003
The paper
Ma, Y. C., Kong, X. W., Yang, B., Zhang, X. L., Yan, X. Y., Yang, J. C., & Xiong, Z. Q. (2013). Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity of annual rice–wheat rotations with integrated soil–crop system management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.11.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.